ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Early Physical Linear Growth of Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants Based on Computer Analysis Method.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opportunities and Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Length of Stay in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Retracted: Early Physical Linear Growth of Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants Based on Computer Analysis Method.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- Development of the gut microbiota in healthy twins during the first 2 years of life and associations with body mass index z-score: Results from the Wuhan twin birth cohort study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-18Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article proposes that machine learning can break through the technical limitations of the linear growth test for the early physique of infants smaller than gestational age and can accurately calculate and predict the consequences of the disease. For testing the linear growth of the early physique of infants smaller than gestational age, the data collection and judgment are carried out according to the computer analysis method. Experimental results show that 47.3% of infants younger than gestational age may have suffocation. The experimental subjects designed in this study are small-for-gestational-age infants who were hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit from January 2020 to January 2021. According to the relationship between gestational age and birth weight, the survey subjects were divided into two groups: early group and late group. Male and female small-for-gestational-age infants accounted for 68% and 32%, respectively. Among them, the proportion of early gestational age was the most, with more boys than girls, and sick singleton was more than twins. In the early group, the incidence was 52.1% for neonatal asphyxia, 22.5% for feeding intolerance, 14.8% for intracranial hemorrhage, 6.3% for scleredema, 24.7% for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, 24.6% for hypoglycemia, 1.1% for apnea, and 3.2% for respiratory distress syndrome. Infants develop differently at different stages of corrected gestational age. The incidence of low body weight (6%) after correction for 3 months was significantly reduced compared with correction for gestational age, and the difference was statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.