Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697529›Full record

ReviewBulletin of the National Research Centre2021

Critical review of the

Henok Kessete Afewerky, Ayeni Emmanuel Ayodeji, Bashir Bolaji Tiamiyu, Joshua Iseoluwa Orege, Emmanuel Sunday Okeke, Aanuoluwapo Opeyemi Oyejobi, Petuel Ndip Ndip Bate, Sherif Babatunde Adeyemi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Temperature stress and its effects on phytochemical dynamics and antioxidant activity inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Extraction of Bioactive Compounds FromInternational journal of food science · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. A standardized combination ofFood & nutrition research · 2024
    Article
  16. The benefits of ashwagandha (Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Phytochemicals ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Henok Kessete AfewerkyDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030 China.ORCID 0000-0001-7030-3224
Ayeni Emmanuel AyodejiOrganization of African Academic Doctors, Nairobi, 00100 Kenya.
Bashir Bolaji TiamiyuOrganization of African Academic Doctors, Nairobi, 00100 Kenya.
Joshua Iseoluwa OregeOrganization of African Academic Doctors, Nairobi, 00100 Kenya.
Emmanuel Sunday OkekeOrganization of African Academic Doctors, Nairobi, 00100 Kenya.
Aanuoluwapo Opeyemi OyejobiOrganization of African Academic Doctors, Nairobi, 00100 Kenya.
Petuel Ndip Ndip BateOrganization of African Academic Doctors, Nairobi, 00100 Kenya.
Sherif Babatunde AdeyemiOrganization of African Academic Doctors, Nairobi, 00100 Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMETHODOLOGY: Scientific articles and publications were scooped and sourced from high-impact factor journals and filtered with relevant keywords on

resultsThis critical review covers the

conclusion

Indexed as

AfricaCommercializationEthnobotanyEthnomedicineMedicinal PlantPathophysiologyPharmaceuticsPhytochemistryWithania somnifera

Identifiers

PMID34697529
PMCPMC8529567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.