Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697409›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2022

Enhancing the use of exposure science across EU chemical policies as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020-2030.

Yuri Bruinen de Bruin, Antonio Franco, Andreas Ahrens, Alick Morris, Hans Verhagen, Stylianos Kephalopoulos, Valeria Dulio, Jaroslav Slobodnik, Dick T H M Sijm, Theo Vermeire and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pandemic management requires exposure science.Environment international · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yuri Bruinen de BruinEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Space, Security and Migration, Geel, Belgium. ybr@cefic.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0558-0425
Antonio FrancoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate on Health, Consumer and Reference Materials, Ispra, Italy.
Andreas AhrensEuropean Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland.
Alick MorrisEuropean Commission, Directorate General Employment, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Hans VerhagenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Stylianos KephalopoulosEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate on Health, Consumer and Reference Materials, Ispra, Italy.
Valeria DulioINERIS - National Institute for Environment and Industrial Risks, Verneuil en Halatte, France.
Jaroslav SlobodnikEnvironmental Institute, Koš, Slovakia.
Dick T H M SijmDutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Theo VermeireRIVM - National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Takaaki ItoOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
Koki TakakiOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
Jonathas De MelloUnited Nations Environment Programme, Paris, France.
Jos BessemsFlemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol, Belgium.
Maryam Zare JeddiRIVM - National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Celia Tanarro GozaloEuropean Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland.
Kevin PollardEuropean Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland.
Josephine McCourtEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Space, Security and Migration, Geel, Belgium.
Peter FantkeQuantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA scientific framework on exposure science will boost the multiuse of exposure knowledge across EU chemicals-related policies and improve risk assessment, risk management and communication across EU safety, security and sustainability domains.

objectiveTo stimulate public and private actors to align and strengthen the cross-policy adoption of exposure assessment data, methods and tools across EU legislation.

methodsBy mapping and analysing the EU regulatory landscape making use of exposure information, policy and research challenges and key areas of action are identified and translated into opportunities enhancing policy and scientific efficiency.

resultsIdentified key areas of actions are to develop a common scientific exposure assessment framework, supported by baseline acceptance criteria and a shared knowledge base enhancing exchangeability and acceptability of exposure knowledge within and across EU chemicals-related policies. Furthermore, such framework will improve communication and management across EU chemical safety, security and sustainability policies comprising sourcing, manufacturing and global trade of goods and waste management. In support of building such a common framework and its effective use in policy and industry, exposure science innovation needs to be better embedded along the whole policymaking cycle, and be integrated into companies' safety and sustainability management systems. This will help to systemically improve regulatory risk management practices. SIGNIFICANCE: This paper constitutes an important step towards the implementation of the EU Green Deal and its underlying policy strategies, such as the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability.

Indexed as

PolicyHumansRisk AssessmentExposure assessment; EU Green Deal; Chemical safety; Chemical security; Environmental sustainability; ISES Europe

Identifiers

PMID34697409
PMCPMC9349036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.