Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697394›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A novel method for causal structure discovery from EHR data and its application to type-2 diabetes mellitus.

Xinpeng Shen, Sisi Ma, Prashanthi Vemuri, M Regina Castro, Pedro J Caraballo, Gyorgy J Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Power Analysis for Causal Discovery.International journal of data science and analytics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinpeng ShenInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sisi MaInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Prashanthi VemuriDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M Regina CastroDivision of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Pedro J CaraballoDepartment of Internal Medicine, and Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gyorgy J SimonInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. simo0342@umn.edu.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NIH HHS AG056366NIH HHS LM011972NIH HHS TR002494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern AI-based clinical decision support models owe their success in part to the very large number of predictors they use. Safe and robust decision support, especially for intervention planning, requires causal, not associative, relationships. Traditional methods of causal discovery, clinical trials and extracting biochemical pathways, are resource intensive and may not scale up to the number and complexity of relationships sufficient for precision treatment planning. Computational causal structure discovery (CSD) from electronic health records (EHR) data can represent a solution, however, current CSD methods fall short on EHR data. This paper presents a CSD method tailored to the EHR data. The application of the proposed methodology was demonstrated on type-2 diabetes mellitus. A large EHR dataset from Mayo Clinic was used as development cohort, and another large dataset from an independent health system, M Health Fairview, as external validation cohort. The proposed method achieved very high recall (.95) and substantially higher precision than the general-purpose methods (.84 versus .29, and .55). The causal relationships extracted from the development and external validation cohorts had a high (81%) overlap. Due to the adaptations to EHR data, the proposed method is more suitable for use in clinical decision support than the general-purpose methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease SusceptibilityElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningModels, StatisticalPublic Health SurveillanceReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID34697394
PMCPMC8546093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.