Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697390›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Psychological and physiological evidence for an initial 'Rough Sketch' calculation of personal space.

Roger B H Tootell, Sarah L Zapetis, Baktash Babadi, Zahra Nasiriavanaki, Dylan E Hughes, Kim Mueser, Michael Otto, Ed Pace-Schott, Daphne J Holt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Interdigitated Columnar Representation of Personal Space and Visual Space in Human Parietal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roger B H TootellHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. tootell@mgh.harvard.edu.
Sarah L ZapetisDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Baktash BabadiDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Zahra NasiriavanakiDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Dylan E HughesDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Kim MueserCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael OttoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Ed Pace-SchottDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Daphne J HoltDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of social distance in psychosisR01MH109562 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOLT, DAPHNE J · 2016 to 2020
$4.1M
Translational Neuroscience Training for CliniciansT32MH112485 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L, ROFFMAN, JOSHUA LAWRENCE · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109562NIMH NIH HHS RO1MH109562NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH112485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personal space has been defined as "the area individuals maintain around themselves into which others cannot intrude without arousing discomfort". However, the precise relationship between discomfort (or arousal) responses as a function of distance from an observer remains incompletely understood. Also the mechanisms involved in recognizing conspecifics and distinguishing them from other objects within personal space have not been identified. Accordingly, here we measured personal space preferences in response to real humans and human-like avatars (in virtual reality), using well-validated "stop distance" procedures. Based on threshold measurements of personal space, we examined within-subject variations in discomfort-related responses across multiple distances (spanning inside and outside each individual's personal space boundary), as reflected by psychological (ratings) and physiological (skin conductance) responses to both humans and avatars. We found that the discomfort-by-distance functions for both humans and avatars were closely fit by a power law. These results suggest that the brain computation of visually-defined personal space begins with a 'rough sketch' stage, which generates responses to a broad range of human-like stimuli, in addition to humans. Analogous processing mechanisms may underlie other brain functions which respond similarly to both real and simulated human body parts.

Indexed as

Personal SpaceAdultFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMalePhotic StimulationSkin Physiological PhenomenaSpace PerceptionVirtual RealityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34697390
PMCPMC8545955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.