Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697177›Full record

SynthesisIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Efficacy of Intravenous Use of Lidocaine in Postoperative Pain Management After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of RCTs.

Chamaidi Sarakatsianou, Konstantinos Perivoliotis, George Tzovaras, Athina A Samara, Ioannis Baloyiannis

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chamaidi SarakatsianouDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Konstantinos PerivoliotisDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
George TzovarasDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Athina A SamaraDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece at.samara93@gmail.com.
Ioannis BaloyiannisDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
University Hospital of Larissa · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimCurrent literature reports regarding the effect of lidocaine in laparoscopic colectomies are still inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature and estimate the overall effect of intravenous lidocaine administration in postoperative recovery of patients submitted to laparoscopic colectomies. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was completed based on the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A systematic screening using scholar databases was performed (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL).

resultsIn total, 8 studies and 407 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Introduction of intravenous lidocaine in the perioperative analgesia scheme did not improve hospitalization duration (p=0.23), morphine consumption (p=0.96), perioperative bowel function (first flatus p=0.40, first bowel opened p=0.13, first diet p=0.16), or the overall complication rates (p=0.42). Overall, high heterogeneity levels were identified.

conclusionCurrent evidence indicates that lidocaine does not improve rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomies.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryLaparoscopyAnesthetics, LocalHumansLidocainePain MeasurementPostoperative PainAnesthetics, LocalLidocainecolorectallaparoscopicLidocainemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID34697177
PMCPMC8627741
OpenAlexW3209062817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.