ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2021
Educational intervention to improve appropriate digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOur previous retrospecive study evaluating the appropriateness of serum digoxin concentration (SDC) measurements revealed errors in the timing of blood specimen collection in 98% of the tests. The aim of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness of the SDC measurements and the factors involved in inappropriate test-ordering, after training health personnel in digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring.
methodsThis is a training-based quasi-experimental study. The residents and nurses of the Cardiology Clinic were trained first in December 2017, and refresher training courses were carried out every month throughout the study. The medical data of the inpatients receiving digoxin therapy were recorded prospectively, between January and December 2018. The appropriateness of the physicians' orders for SDC measurement was evaluated according to the criteria of the right indication and right timing of blood collection. The results are presented by descriptive statistics, Student's t-test and χ
resultsA total of 232 SDC tests were ordered for 121 patients (age: 71.0±12.6 years, 56.2% women). Of these orders,129 (55.6%) were considered appropriate: 205 (88.4%) for indication and 129 (62.9%) for blood collection timing. There was a significant correlation between inappropriate order for SDC test and the age of the patient, female gender, impairment of renal function tests, high levels of serum BNP and the number of medications used (P<0.005).
conclusionsApproximately a one-half decrease in inappropriate tests compared with our previous study results imply that education has a positive effect on physician behaviour. However, physicians' concerns due to increased risk factors for the patient still play a role in inappropriate test-ordering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.