Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697013›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2022

Using Team Innovation and Networking to Respond to Rapid Changes in the Academy.

Helen C Park, Jeremy A Hughes, Rocke L DeMark, Amy Diepenbrock, Katie S McClendon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helen C ParkRoseman University of Health Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Henderson, Nevada hpark@doc.nv.gov.
Jeremy A HughesChicago State University, College of Pharmacy, Chicago, Illinois.
Rocke L DeMarkChapman University, School of Pharmacy, Irvine, California.
Amy DiepenbrockUniversity of the Incarnate Word, Feik School of Pharmacy, San Antonio, Texas.
Katie S McClendonUniversity of Mississippi, School of Pharmacy, Jackson, Mississippi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When COVID-19 shuttered schools across the nation, it propelled higher education institutions into uncharted territories. Institutions had to make rapid decisions in a short period of time with limited information or direction. In these uncertain and challenging times, pharmacy academics in the United States and around the world reached out to one another to discuss, share, and learn. What began with a few members of the Student Services Personnel Special Interest Group (SIG) grew to many members who banded together as a team through open discussions to innovative problem-solving. Working together through open discussions created a setting that promoted diverse ideas, multiple perspectives, and a depth of knowledge to address some of the most challenging issues faced by pharmacy education. When partnering together, institutions had a much greater resource of knowledge and support that could be leveraged to broadly benefit the Academy.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, PharmacyPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacyHumansUnited StatesUniversitiesCOVID-19networkingopen discussionSIGstudent affairs

Identifiers

PMID34697013
PMCPMC10159433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.