Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697010›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices.

Stephen Gilbert, Matthew Fenech, Martin Hirsch, Shubhanan Upadhyay, Andrea Biasiucci, Johannes Starlinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen GilbertAda Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1997-1689
Matthew FenechAda Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7933-4617
Martin HirschAda Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3268-4921
Shubhanan UpadhyayAda Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5588-8110
Andrea BiasiucciLaboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-0370
Johannes StarlingerHowto Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0832-9604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the greatest strengths of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches in health care is that their performance can be continually improved based on updates from automated learning from data. However, health care ML models are currently essentially regulated under provisions that were developed for an earlier age of slowly updated medical devices-requiring major documentation reshape and revalidation with every major update of the model generated by the ML algorithm. This creates minor problems for models that will be retrained and updated only occasionally, but major problems for models that will learn from data in real time or near real time. Regulators have announced action plans for fundamental changes in regulatory approaches. In this Viewpoint, we examine the current regulatory frameworks and developments in this domain. The status quo and recent developments are reviewed, and we argue that these innovative approaches to health care need matching innovative approaches to regulation and that these approaches will bring benefits for patients. International perspectives from the World Health Organization, and the Food and Drug Administration's proposed approach, based around oversight of tool developers' quality management systems and defined algorithm change protocols, offer a much-needed paradigm shift, and strive for a balanced approach to enabling rapid improvements in health care through AI innovation while simultaneously ensuring patient safety. The draft European Union (EU) regulatory framework indicates similar approaches, but no detail has yet been provided on how algorithm change protocols will be implemented in the EU. We argue that detail must be provided, and we describe how this could be done in a manner that would allow the full benefits of AI/ML-based innovation for EU patients and health care systems to be realized.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAlgorithmsDelivery of Health CareHumansalgorithm change protocolartificial intelligencehealth carehealthcaremachine learningregulationregulatory framework

Identifiers

PMID34697010
PMCPMC8579211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.