ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021
Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Regulatory Approval: Lifecycle Assurance for Clinical Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Challenges and Recommendations in Regulating AI Medical Devices in the European Union: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- EU's fragmented early-stage medical device study requirements need reform.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Reimagining antimicrobial resistance: AI-driven predictive epidemiology and the C-AMRE framework for next-generation antibiotic discovery.The Journal of antibiotics · 2026Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Wearable Devices and Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Monitoring: Current Evidence and Future Directions for Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Regulating digital surgery to balance safety and innovation: a SAGES white paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- The HALO Model: A Learning Health System Framework for Artificial Intelligence.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Engineering smart polymeric lipid nanoparticles for breast cancer: AI-guided formulation design, biological barriers, and translational constraints.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Racial Disparities and the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Maternal Mortality: A Literature Review.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Prediction to Horizon: Clinicians' Negotiations of AI-Driven Personal Prognoses in Clinical Practice.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Rare Diseases: Workflow-Integrated Precision Kidney Care.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Clinical Model Autophagy: The Risk of Interpretative Drift in Recursive Medical AI.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- From Tool to Agent: A Semi-Systematic Review of Human-AI Alignment and a Proposed Tiered Healing Ecosystem for Mental Health.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital medicine's international race for regulatory sandboxes and voluntary alternative pathways picks up tempo.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Hidden Fragilities and the Path to Resilience.Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- A nursing perspective on human-AI collaboration in personalized breast cancer care pathways.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The pediatric AI readiness framework: bridging evidence to practice in pediatric artificial intelligence.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- A six-level clinical autonomy framework for artificial intelligence in dentistry.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the greatest strengths of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches in health care is that their performance can be continually improved based on updates from automated learning from data. However, health care ML models are currently essentially regulated under provisions that were developed for an earlier age of slowly updated medical devices-requiring major documentation reshape and revalidation with every major update of the model generated by the ML algorithm. This creates minor problems for models that will be retrained and updated only occasionally, but major problems for models that will learn from data in real time or near real time. Regulators have announced action plans for fundamental changes in regulatory approaches. In this Viewpoint, we examine the current regulatory frameworks and developments in this domain. The status quo and recent developments are reviewed, and we argue that these innovative approaches to health care need matching innovative approaches to regulation and that these approaches will bring benefits for patients. International perspectives from the World Health Organization, and the Food and Drug Administration's proposed approach, based around oversight of tool developers' quality management systems and defined algorithm change protocols, offer a much-needed paradigm shift, and strive for a balanced approach to enabling rapid improvements in health care through AI innovation while simultaneously ensuring patient safety. The draft European Union (EU) regulatory framework indicates similar approaches, but no detail has yet been provided on how algorithm change protocols will be implemented in the EU. We argue that detail must be provided, and we describe how this could be done in a manner that would allow the full benefits of AI/ML-based innovation for EU patients and health care systems to be realized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.