Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696824›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Septal cholinergic input to CA2 hippocampal region controls social novelty discrimination via nicotinic receptor-mediated disinhibition.

Domenico Pimpinella, Valentina Mastrorilli, Corinna Giorgi, Silke Coemans, Salvatore Lecca, Arnaud L Lalive, Hannah Ostermann, Elke C Fuchs, Hannah Monyer, Andrea Mele and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. When dreams feel real: the MÖBIUS model.Communications biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cholinergic regulation of dendritic CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Domenico PimpinellaEuropean Brain Research Institute (EBRI), Fondazione Rita Levi-Montalcini, Rome, Italy.
Valentina MastrorilliDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology 'C. Darwin', Center for Research in Neurobiology 'D. Bovet', Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Corinna GiorgiEuropean Brain Research Institute (EBRI), Fondazione Rita Levi-Montalcini, Rome, Italy.
Silke CoemansEuropean Brain Research Institute (EBRI), Fondazione Rita Levi-Montalcini, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore LeccaDepartment of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5411-5485
Arnaud L LaliveDepartment of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hannah OstermannDepartment of Clinical Neurobiology of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Elke C FuchsDepartment of Clinical Neurobiology of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hannah MonyerDepartment of Clinical Neurobiology of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea MeleDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology 'C. Darwin', Center for Research in Neurobiology 'D. Bovet', Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3155-5610
Enrico CherubiniEuropean Brain Research Institute (EBRI), Fondazione Rita Levi-Montalcini, Rome, Italy.
Marilena GriguoliEuropean Brain Research Institute (EBRI), Fondazione Rita Levi-Montalcini, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4067-8927
European Brain Research Institute · ITGerman Cancer Research Center · DESapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Lausanne · CHInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology · ITNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetylcholine (ACh), released in the hippocampus from fibers originating in the medial septum/diagonal band of Broca (MSDB) complex, is crucial for learning and memory. The CA2 region of the hippocampus has received increasing attention in the context of social memory. However, the contribution of ACh to this process remains unclear. Here, we show that in mice, ACh controls social memory. Specifically, MSDB cholinergic neurons inhibition impairs social novelty discrimination, meaning the propensity of a mouse to interact with a novel rather than a familiar conspecific. This effect is mimicked by a selective antagonist of nicotinic AChRs delivered in CA2. Ex vivo recordings from hippocampal slices provide insight into the underlying mechanism, as activation of nAChRs by nicotine increases the excitatory drive to CA2 principal cells via disinhibition. In line with this observation, optogenetic activation of cholinergic neurons in MSDB increases the firing of CA2 principal cells in vivo. These results point to nAChRs as essential players in social novelty discrimination by controlling inhibition in the CA2 region.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsCA2 Region, HippocampalCholinergic NeuronsClozapineDiagonal Band of BrocaExploratory BehaviorMaleMiceReceptors, NicotinicSocial BehaviorSocial InteractionAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineclozapine N-oxideReceptors, NicotinicacetylcholineCA2 regionhippocampusmedial septummouseneurosciencenicotinic receptorssocial memory

Identifiers

PMID34696824
PMCPMC8547952
OpenAlexW3209863266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.