Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696805›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

L Schummers, N Oveisi, M S Ohtsuka, J A Hutcheon, K A Ahrens, J Liauw, W V Norman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

L SchummersDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, E303 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada. laura.schummers@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3536-0498
N OveisiDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, E303 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
M S OhtsukaDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, E303 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
J A HutcheonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Suite 930, 1125 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2K8, Canada.
K A AhrensMuskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, 32 Bedford St, Portland, ME, 04101, USA.
J LiauwDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Suite 930, 1125 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2K8, Canada.
W V NormanDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, E303 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CAUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Southern Maine · US

Funding

CIHR CPP-329455-107837CIHR #DA5-170277CIHR TLS-170676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly pregnancy loss (unintended pregnancy loss before 20 completed weeks of gestation) is a common adverse pregnancy outcome, with previous evidence reporting incidence ranging from 10 to 30% of detected pregnancies. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the incidence and range of early pregnancy loss in contemporary pregnant populations based on studies with good internal and external validity. Findings may be useful for clinical counseling in pre-conception and family planning settings and for people who experience early pregnancy loss.

methodsWe will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases using combinations of medical subject headings and keywords. Peer-reviewed, full-text original research articles that meet the following criteria will be included: (1) human study; (2) study designs: controlled clinical trials or observational studies with at least 100 pregnancies in the denominator, or systematic reviews of studies using these designs; (3) conducted in high-income countries; (4) reporting early pregnancy loss incidence, defined as unintended early pregnancy loss occurring prior to 20 weeks' gestation expressed as the number of losses among all pregnancies in the study period; (5) among a contemporary (1990 or later) general population of pregnancies; and (6) published between January 1, 1990, and August 31, 2021. We will assess the quality of included studies according to the United States Preventive Services Task Force Criteria for Assessing Internal and External Validity of Individual Studies. If appropriate, based on methodological comparability across included studies, we will conduct meta-analyses using random effects models to estimate the pooled incidence of early pregnancy loss among all studies with both good internal and external validity, with meta-analyses stratified by study design type (survey-based or self-reported and medical record-based), by induced abortion restrictions (restricted vs. unrestricted), and by gestational age (first trimester only vs. all gestational ages before 20 weeks). DISCUSSION: This systematic review will synthesize existing evidence to calculate a current estimate of early pregnancy loss incidence and variability in reported incidence estimates in high-income settings. The findings of this review may inform updates to clinical counseling in pre-conception and family planning settings, as well as for patients experiencing early pregnancy loss. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: We have registered this review with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO #226267 ).

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReview Literature as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34696805
PMCPMC8543941
OpenAlexW3210707394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.