Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696789›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Telehealth and digital developments in society that persons 75 years and older in European countries have been part of: a scoping review.

Moonika Raja, Jorunn Bjerkan, Ingjerd G Kymre, Kathleen T Galvin, Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
27.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Virtual humans in geriatric care: an integrative review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Digital facilitation: supporting the use of NHS digital and online services.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Moonika RajaFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway. moonika.raja@nord.no.
Jorunn BjerkanFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Levanger, Norway.
Ingjerd G KymreFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Kathleen T GalvinSchool of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Lisbeth UhrenfeldtFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Nord University · NOAalborg University · DKUniversity of Brighton · GB

Funding

Horizon 2020 () 813928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemographic changes are leading to an ageing population in Europe. People are becoming more dependent on digital technologies and health ministries invest increasingly in digitalisation. Societal digital demands impact older people and learning to use new telehealth systems and digital devices are seen as a means of securing their needs.

methodsThe present study undertakes a scoping review in order to map relevant evidence about telehealth and digital developments in society involving citizens aged 75 and over in European countries. It focuses on their experiences and the main barriers to, and facilitators of, societal digital demands. A framework proposed by Arksey and O`Malley was used to guide the scoping review process. The studies included in the review covered telehealth, digital technology and digital devices, and the context covered participants` own home or surroundings. A comprehensive search on PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase and Open Grey was undertaken.

resultsOut of 727 identified citations, 13 sources which met the inclusion criteria (9 original study articles, 2 theses, 1 letter about a product and 1 project report). Few of the studies identified have investigated European citizens 75 years and older separately. The studies included varied in their design, location and focus. Older people have experienced both telehealth and digital devices making life easier and the opposite. The outstanding facilitator found was that technology should be easy to use, and difficulty in remembering the instructions was seen as an important barrier. Interestingly, both social support and lack of social support were found as facilitators of using new devices.

conclusionsTelehealth may give a sense of security but learning to use a new device often takes extra effort. Older people were more open to new devices if the possible advantages of the new technology outweighed the effort that would be involved in adopting a new strategy. As technology develops rapidly, and life expectancy in Europe is anticipated to rise continually, there is a need for new and additional research among older European citizens. Future research should cover the technical solutions most relevant to older people today, social support and participants` access to the devices.

Indexed as

TelemedicineAgedAgingEuropeHumansLearningTechnologyAged 80 and overDigital devicesHealth services for the agedSocietal digital demandsTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34696789
PMCPMC8546957
OpenAlexW3209319083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.