Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696746›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2021

Evaluation of problematic screen exposure in pre-schoolers using a unique tool called "seven-in-seven screen exposure questionnaire": cross-sectional study.

S Songül Yalçin, Özlem Tezol, Nilgün Çaylan, Meryem Erat Nergiz, Deniz Yildiz, Şeyma Çiçek, Ayşe Oflu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06117631 (First Thousand Days), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06117631 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

First Thousand Days: Prevention of Early Life Obesity in Latino Infants and Toddlers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2023 to 2027Enrolled256ConditionsInfant Overweight, Infant Obesity, Infant Overnutrition, Infant DevelopmentArmsCentering Parenting, Bright by Text
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S Songül YalçinDepartment of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. siyalcin@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-9061-4281
Özlem TezolDepartment of Pediatrics, Mersin University, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey.
Nilgün ÇaylanDepartment of Child and Adolescents Health, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Meryem Erat NergizDepartment of Pediatrics, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Yenimahalle Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Deniz YildizDepartment of Pediatrics, Dr. Sami Ulus Child Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Şeyma ÇiçekDepartment of Pediatrics, Etimesgut Şehit Sait Ertürk Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ayşe OfluDepartment of Pediatrics, Afyon Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreen media exposure has been increasing in the preschool years. Risky aspects of screen exposure have many potential negative effects on children's health. We aimed to evaluate problematic screen exposure in Turkish preschool children by using a unique tool called the "Seven-in-Seven Screen Exposure Questionnaire" and to investigate factors associated with problematic screen exposure.

methodsA questionnaire form was designed including general descriptive questions in the first part. In the second part, a questionnaire we designed called the "Seven-in-Seven Screen Exposure Questionnaire" was conducted to evaluate problematic screen exposure characteristics. The questionnaire included seven items: daily screen time, viewing with parent(s), setting screen limits, screen exposure during meals and in the hour before bedtime, age of onset of screen exposure, and viewing low-quality content. The total problematic screen exposure score (range 0-13) was generated by summing scores from the seven items. Total scores are classified into two categories: low (< 7) and high (≥ 7). Logistic regression was performed to search for independent parameters associated with problematic screen exposure.

resultsOne thousand two hundred forty-five mother-child pairs participated in this study. The median age of the children was 3.9 (IQR: 2.9-4.7) years and 51% were males. Overall, 280 children (22.5%) had a problematic screen exposure score of ≥7 (high). The median problematic screen exposure score was 4 (IQR: 3-6). Maternal age of < 30 years; paternal age of ≥30 years; maternal educational level of ≤12 years; the age of 24-48 months; home-based daycare; postponing eating, toileting, or sleeping while using a screen; and using touchscreen devices were found to be associated with an increased risk of having a high problematic screen exposure score.

conclusionDeveloping national scales to monitor problematic screen use in children would be more effective than monitoring screen time alone. All of the screen use characteristics not recommended in children would be evaluated using problematic screen exposure scales. The "Seven-in-Seven Screen Exposure Questionnaire" may serve as an example for further studies.

Indexed as

ParentsScreen TimeAdultChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTelevisionPre-schoolersProblematic screen exposureQuestionnaireUnique

Identifiers

PMID34696746
PMCPMC8546938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.