Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696728›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms.

Jing Hu, Longwei Zhou, Bo Li, Xiaolong Zhang, Nansheng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing HuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Longwei ZhouSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Bo LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaolong ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. xiaolong.zhang@wust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-2044
Nansheng ChenMolecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada. chenn@sfu.ca.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61572381National Natural Science Foundation of China 61972299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the process of designing drugs and proteins, it is crucial to recognize hot regions in protein-protein interactions. Each hot region of protein-protein interaction is composed of at least three hot spots, which play an important role in binding. However, it takes time and labor force to identify hot spots through biological experiments. If predictive models based on machine learning methods can be trained, the drug design process can be effectively accelerated.

resultsThe results show that different machine learning algorithms perform similarly, as evaluating using the F-measure. The main differences between these methods are recall and precision. Since the key attribute of hot regions is that they are packed tightly, we used the cluster algorithm to predict hot regions. By combining Gaussian Naïve Bayes and DBSCAN, the F-measure of hot region prediction can reach 0.809.

conclusionsIn this paper, different machine learning models such as Gaussian Naïve Bayes, SVM, Xgboost, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network are used to predict hot spots. The experiment results show that the combination of hot spot classification algorithm with higher recall rate and clustering algorithm with higher precision can effectively improve the accuracy of hot region prediction.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningBayes TheoremCluster AnalysisProteinsSupport Vector MachineProteinsDBSCANGaussian Naïve BayesHot regionHot spotProtein–protein interactionSVM

Identifiers

PMID34696728
PMCPMC8543831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.