Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696405›Full record

ReviewViruses2021

Best Molecular Tools to Investigate Coronavirus Diversity in Mammals: A Comparison.

Petra Drzewnioková, Francesca Festa, Valentina Panzarin, Davide Lelli, Ana Moreno, Barbara Zecchin, Paola De Benedictis, Stefania Leopardi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Metagenomic analysis of viral diversity in Portuguese bats.Veterinary research communications · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Presence ofViruses · 2024
    Article
  20. First Report ofViruses · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Petra DrzewniokováLaboratory of Emerging Viral Zoonoses, Research and Innovation Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-5974
Francesca FestaLaboratory of Emerging Viral Zoonoses, Research and Innovation Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Valentina PanzarinInnovative Virology Laboratory, Research and Innovation Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9376-1612
Davide LelliVirology Unit, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5775-6058
Ana MorenoVirology Unit, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8497-9708
Barbara ZecchinLaboratory of Emerging Viral Zoonoses, Research and Innovation Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Paola De BenedictisLaboratory of Emerging Viral Zoonoses, Research and Innovation Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6760-1933
Stefania LeopardiLaboratory of Emerging Viral Zoonoses, Research and Innovation Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · IT

Funding

Horizon 2020 862605 ID 95 ConVErgence.Ministero della Salute IZSVE 01/20 RCS and ID 95 ConVErgence
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are widespread and highly diversified in wildlife and domestic mammals and can emerge as zoonotic or epizootic pathogens and consequently host shift from these reservoirs, highlighting the importance of veterinary surveillance. All genera can be found in mammals, with α and β showing the highest frequency and diversification. The aims of this study were to review the literature for features of CoV surveillance in animals, to test widely used molecular protocols, and to identify the most effective one in terms of spectrum and sensitivity. We combined a literature review with analyses in silico and in vitro using viral strains and archive field samples. We found that most protocols defined as pan-coronavirus are strongly biased towards α- and β-CoVs and show medium-low sensitivity. The best results were observed using our new protocol, showing LoD 100 PFU/mL for SARS-CoV-2, 50 TCID

Indexed as

AlphacoronavirusAnimalsAnimals, WildBetacoronavirusChiropteraCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19DeltacoronavirusGammacoronavirusGenome, ViralHumansLivestockRodentiaSARS-CoV-2BoCoVCaCoVcoronaviruspan-CoVRT-PCRSARS-CoV-2surveillance

Identifiers

PMID34696405
PMCPMC8538982
OpenAlexW3205072278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.