Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696275›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Portuguese-Speaking Countries: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach.

Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa, Jules Ramon Brito Teixeira, Iracema Lua, Fernanda de Oliveira Souza, Andrêa Jacqueline Fortes Ferreira, Guilherme Schneider, Herica Emilia Félix de Carvalho, Layze Braz de Oliveira, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida Lima, Anderson Reis de Sousa and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Risk-Perception Change Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine's Side Effects: The Role of Individual Differences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Álvaro Francisco Lopes de SousaGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM), Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2710-2122
Jules Ramon Brito TeixeiraEpidemiology Center, Feira de Santana State University, Feira de Santana 44036-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-7810
Iracema LuaInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil.
Fernanda de Oliveira SouzaHealth, Education and Work Department, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Santo Antônio de Jesus 44380-000, Brazil.
Andrêa Jacqueline Fortes FerreiraData and Knowledge Integration Center for Health-CIDACS, Salvador 41745-715, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6884-3624
Guilherme SchneiderHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network (HEID), University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4244-6217
Herica Emilia Félix de CarvalhoHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network (HEID), University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5913-8886
Layze Braz de OliveiraHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network (HEID), University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.
Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida LimaCenter for Research in Collective Health, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9062-0742
Anderson Reis de SousaStudy Group on Health Care, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40110-909, Brazil.
Telma Maria Evangelista de AraújoNursing Department, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina 64049-550, Brazil.
Emerson Lucas Silva CamargoHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network (HEID), University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6119-5193
Mônica Oliveira Batista OriáNursing Department, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil.
Isabel CraveiroGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM), Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4348-1986
Tânia Maria de AraújoEpidemiology Center, Feira de Santana State University, Feira de Santana 44036-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2766-7799
Isabel Amélia Costa MendesRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0704-4319
Carla Arena Aparecida VenturaRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.
Isabel SousaMinistério da Saúde de São Tomé e Príncipe, Cidade Capital, Sao Tome and Principe.
Rodrigo Mota de OliveiraRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.
Manuel SimãoHigher Institute of Health Sciences, Agostinho Neto University, Luanda 56910-999, Angola.
Inês FronteiraGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM), Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-4585
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTAgostinho Neto University · AOCentro Nacional de Endemias · STUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia · BR

Funding

Centro Universitário UNINOVAFAPI 22/ 2021-2022Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UID/004413-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (VH) has caused concerns due to the possible fluctuations that may occur directly impacting the control of the pandemic. In this study, we aimed to estimate the prevalence and factors associated with COVID-19 VH in Portuguese-speaking countries. We developed a web survey (N:6,843) using an online, structured, and validated questionnaire. We used Measurement Models, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Exploratory Structural Equation Models, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis for the data analysis. The overall prevalence of COVID-19 VH in Portuguese-speaking countries was 21.1%. showed a statistically significant direct effect for VH: vaccine-related conspiracy beliefs (VB) (β = 0.886), perceived stress (PS) (β = 0.313), COVID-19 Misinformation (MIS) (β = 0.259) and individual responses to COVID-19 (CIR) (β = -0.122). The effect of MIS and CIR for VH was greater among men and of PS and VB among women; the effect of PS was greater among the youngest and of VB and CIR among the oldest. No discrepant differences were identified in the analyzed education strata. In conclusion, we found that conspiracy beliefs related to the vaccine strongly influence the decision to hesitate (not to take or to delay the vaccine). Specific characteristics related to gender, age group, social and cognitive vulnerabilities, added to the knowledge acquired, poorly substantiated and/or misrepresented about the COVID-19 vaccine, need to be considered in the planning of vaccination campaigns. It is necessary to respond in a timely, fast, and accurate manner to the challenges posed by vaccine hesitancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19disinformationglobal healthinfodemicSARS-CoV-2vaccine hesitancyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID34696275
PMCPMC8541102
OpenAlexW3205000337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.