Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696217›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Flu and Tdap Maternal Immunization Hesitancy in Times of COVID-19: An Italian Survey on Multiethnic Sample.

Anna Franca Cavaliere, Simona Zaami, Marta Pallottini, Federica Perelli, Annalisa Vidiri, Enrico Marinelli, Gianluca Straface, Fabrizio Signore, Giovanni Scambia, Laura Marchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contrast Agents during Pregnancy: Pros and Cons When Really Needed.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19, Vaccination, and Female Fertility in the Czech Republic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Franca CavaliereObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Santo Stefano Hospital Prato, AUSL Toscana Centro, Via Suor Niccolina Infermiera, 20/22, 59100 Prato, Italy.
Simona ZaamiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7139
Marta PallottiniObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Santo Stefano Hospital Prato, AUSL Toscana Centro, Via Suor Niccolina Infermiera, 20/22, 59100 Prato, Italy.
Federica PerelliObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, AUSL Toscana Centro, Via Antella, 58, 50012 Firenze, Italy.
Annalisa VidiriDepartment of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via della Pineta Sacchetti, 217, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Enrico MarinelliDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7104-8744
Gianluca StrafaceObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Abano Terme Polyclinic, Abano, Piazza Cristoforo Colombo, 1, 35031 Abano Terme, Italy.
Fabrizio SignoreObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Santo Eugenio Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo, 10, 00144 Roma, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaDepartment of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via della Pineta Sacchetti, 217, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Laura MarchiObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Santo Stefano Hospital Prato, AUSL Toscana Centro, Via Suor Niccolina Infermiera, 20/22, 59100 Prato, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITASL Roma · ITAzienda Usl Toscana Centro · ITPoliclinico Abano Terme · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTdap and flu immunization in pregnancy has been proven to be both effective and safe. Despite this, the vaccination rate in pregnant women is low in Italy. The COVID-19 pandemic has focused the attention of public opinion on communicable diseases, underlining the importance of primary prevention measures such as vaccination. We conducted a survey to investigate the behavior of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding maternal immunization to identify the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in order to overcome them. The new challenge is COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, and preliminary data show hesitancy towards it. Our analysis may be useful to improve immunization in the pregnant population, including through the COVID-19 vaccine.

methodsA targeted survey was performed in Italy including 520 women who experienced in the first trimester of pregnancy, prior to the novel coronavirus spread, the 2019-2020 influenza vaccination campaign and the Tdap vaccine recommendation in the third trimester during the COVID pandemic. They represent a unique model to investigate if the new coronavirus outbreak might have changed attitudes towards vaccination in pregnancy in the same patients. Data were collected from a self-completed paper questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were calculated and percentages were compared using the chi-2 test or Fisher's exact test.

resultsWe obtained data from 195 of the 520 women who gave birth during the inclusion period; 325 cases declined to participate in the survey. A total of 8.7% (17 cases) performed flu vaccination in the first trimester of pregnancy (pre-COVID era), 50.8% (99 cases) accepted Tdap immunization during their third trimester of gestation (COVID-19 pandemic) and 6.7% (13 cases) received both vaccines during pregnancy. For both the flu and Tdap shots, pregnant patients were more likely to accept the vaccines if they were recommended by a healthcare provider, whereas the main reason not to be vaccinated was the lack of such a recommendation.

conclusionsOur survey shows that the COVID-19 experience, which has raised awareness as to the role of vaccines in preventable diseases, may positively change attitudes toward immunization in pregnancy. Vaccination must be recommended to all pregnant women and organized during routine prenatal care as an important element for the prevention of communicable diseases. Vaccination hesitancy can be minimized through consistent recommendation to all pregnant women offered by obstetric staff during routine prenatal care. This approach is likely to be effective in terms of building trust in flu and Tdpa immunization among pregnant women, as well as to avoid unjustified hesitancy towards the more recent COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccineinfluenza vaccinematernally acquired immunitypregnancyTdap

Identifiers

PMID34696217
PMCPMC8537858
OpenAlexW3203700984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.