Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696208›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Overcoming COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Insights from an Online Population-Based Survey in the United States.

Hoda Badr, Xiaotao Zhang, Abiodun Oluyomi, LeChauncy D Woodard, Omolola E Adepoju, Syed Ahsan Raza, Christopher I Amos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vaccination and Therapeutics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hoda BadrDepartment of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4549-9111
Xiaotao ZhangDepartment of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Abiodun OluyomiDepartment of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
LeChauncy D WoodardDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health Science, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77004, USA.
Omolola E AdepojuDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health Science, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77004, USA.
Syed Ahsan RazaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Christopher I AmosDepartment of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8540-7023

Funding

Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DAVID R ROWLEY · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
Translational Research Support CoreP30ES030285 · NIEHS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Cheryl L. Walker · 2019 to 2026
$14.7M
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas RP160097National Heart Lung and Blood Institute 20-312-0217571-66102LNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute RF 50087-2021-0309-S9NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to identify individual-level determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). An online population-based survey was distributed in English and Spanish. Data were derived from 1208 U.S. adults (52% female; 38.7% minorities), 43.5% of whom reported vaccine hesitancy. Multivariable analysis revealed that unemployed individuals were more likely (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.16-2.73,

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Belief ModelTheory of Planned Behaviorvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34696208
PMCPMC8539129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.