Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696200›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Waning of IgG, Total and Neutralizing Antibodies 6 Months Post-Vaccination with BNT162b2 in Healthcare Workers.

Jean-Louis Bayart, Jonathan Douxfils, Constant Gillot, Clara David, François Mullier, Marc Elsen, Christine Eucher, Sandrine Van Eeckhoudt, Tatiana Roy, Vincent Gerin and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Extending ImmunoSpotVaccines · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Louis BayartDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Pierre, 1340 Ottignies, Belgium.
Jonathan DouxfilsDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences, University of Namur, 5000 Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7644-5298
Constant GillotDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences, University of Namur, 5000 Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4151-9760
Clara DavidQualiblood s.a., 5000 Namur, Belgium.
François MullierDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Université Catholique de Louvain, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6947-6099
Marc ElsenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, 5004 Bouge, Belgium.
Christine EucherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, 5004 Bouge, Belgium.
Sandrine Van EeckhoudtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, 5004 Bouge, Belgium.
Tatiana RoyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Pierre, 1340 Ottignies, Belgium.
Vincent GerinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Pierre, 1340 Ottignies, Belgium.
Grégoire WieersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinique St-Pierre, 1340 Ottignies, Belgium.
Christine LaurentDepartment of Internal Medicine, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium.
Mélanie ClossetDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Université Catholique de Louvain, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium.
Jean-Michel DognéDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences, University of Namur, 5000 Namur, Belgium.
Julien FavresseDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences, University of Namur, 5000 Namur, Belgium.
Clinique Saint Pierre · BEUniversity of Namur · BEClinique Saint-Joseph · BEUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data about the long-term duration of antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are still scarce and are important to design vaccination strategies. In this study, 231 healthcare professionals received the two-dose regimen of BNT162b2. Of these, 158 were seronegative and 73 were seropositive at baseline. Samples were collected at several time points. The neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and antibodies against the nucleocapsid and the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 were measured. At day 180, a significant antibody decline was observed in seronegative (-55.4% with total antibody assay; -89.6% with IgG assay) and seropositive individuals (-74.8% with total antibody assay; -79.4% with IgG assay). The estimated half-life of IgG from the peak humoral response was 21 days (95% CI: 13-65) in seronegative and 53 days (95% CI: 40-79) in seropositive individuals. The estimated half-life of total antibodies was longer and ranged from 68 days (95% CI: 54-90) to 114 days (95% CI: 87-167) in seropositive and seronegative individuals, respectively. The decline of NAbs was more pronounced (-98.6%) and around 45% of the subjects tested were negative at day 180. Whether this decrease correlates with an equivalent drop in the clinical effectiveness against the virus would require appropriate clinical studies.

Indexed as

antibody responseBNT162b2COVID-19mRNA vaccineneutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34696200
PMCPMC8540417
OpenAlexW3197801192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.