Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696077›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Quantitative Model for Optical Coherence Tomography.

Leopold Veselka, Lisa Krainz, Leonidas Mindrinos, Wolfgang Drexler, Peter Elbau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leopold VeselkaFaculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9909-8121
Lisa KrainzCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4436-8205
Leonidas MindrinosFaculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7807-8153
Wolfgang DrexlerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3557-6398
Peter ElbauFaculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5894-5793

Funding

FWF Austrian Science Fund F6803-N36 F6804-N36
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a widely used imaging technique in the micrometer regime, which gained accelerating interest in medical imaging in the last twenty years. In up-to-date OCT literature, certain simplifying assumptions are made for the reconstructions, but for many applications, a more realistic description of the OCT imaging process is of interest. In mathematical models, for example, the incident angle of light onto the sample is usually neglected or a plane wave description for the light-sample interaction in OCT is used, which ignores almost completely the occurring effects within an OCT measurement process. In this article, we make a first step to a quantitative model by considering the measured intensity as a combination of back-scattered Gaussian beams affected by the system. In contrast to the standard plane wave simplification, the presented model includes system relevant parameters, such as the position of the focus and the spot size of the incident laser beam, which allow a precise prediction of the OCT data. The accuracy of the proposed model-after calibration of all necessary system parameters-is illustrated by simulations and validated by a comparison with experimental data obtained from a 1300 nm swept-source OCT system.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalTomography, Optical CoherenceCalibrationGaussian wavelayered mediumoptical coherence tomographyscatteringswept-source

Identifiers

PMID34696077
PMCPMC8539377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.