Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34696041›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Wearable Sensor-Based Prediction Model of Timed up and Go Test in Older Adults.

Jungyeon Choi, Sheridan M Parker, Brian A Knarr, Yeongjin Gwon, Jong-Hoon Youn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Analysis of Lower Extremity Motor Capacity and Foot Plantar Pressure in Overweight and Obese Elderly Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jungyeon ChoiCollege of Information Science and Technology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9612-3029
Sheridan M ParkerDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7546-7524
Brian A KnarrDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8997-1377
Yeongjin GwonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Jong-Hoon YounCollege of Information Science and Technology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.
University of Nebraska at Omaha · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUDA, CHITTIBABU · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
National Institute of General Medical Sciences 5U54GM115458National Institutes of Health P20 GM109090National Institutes of Health R01 NS114282National Institutes of Health R15 HD094194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test has been frequently used to assess the risk of falls in older adults because it is an easy, fast, and simple method of examining functional mobility and balance without special equipment. The purpose of this study is to develop a model that predicts the TUG test using three-dimensional acceleration data collected from wearable sensors during normal walking. We recruited 37 older adults for an outdoor walking task, and seven inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based sensors were attached to each participant. The elastic net and ridge regression methods were used to reduce gait feature sets and build a predictive model. The proposed predictive model reliably estimated the participants' TUG scores with a small margin of prediction errors. Although the prediction accuracies with two foot-sensors were slightly better than those of other configurations (e.g., MAPE: foot (0.865 s) > foot and pelvis (0.918 s) > pelvis (0.921 s)), we recommend the use of a single IMU sensor at the pelvis since it would provide wearing comfort while avoiding the disturbance of daily activities. The proposed predictive model can enable clinicians to assess older adults' fall risks remotely through the evaluation of the TUG score during their daily walking.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceWearable Electronic DevicesAgedGaitHumansTime and Motion StudiesWalkingaccelerometerelastic netgait analysisridge regressiontimed up and go (TUG)wearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID34696041
PMCPMC8540088
OpenAlexW3206029486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.