Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34695957›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Reactive Exercises with Interactive Objects: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Trial on Task-Driven NMES Grasp Rehabilitation for Subacute and Early Chronic Stroke Patients.

Andrea Crema, Ivan Furfaro, Flavio Raschellà, Mauro Rossini, Johannes Zajc, Constantin Wiesener, Walter Baccinelli, Davide Proserpio, Andreas Augsten, Nancy Immick and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07629908 (Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Combined With Upper Limb Neural Mobilization on Hand Grip and Range of Motion in Post Stroke Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07629908 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Combined With Upper Limb Neural Mobilization on Hand Grip and Range of Motion in Post Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled44ConditionsStroke, Post Stroke Hand RehabilitationArmsConventional physical therapy, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Update on Stroke Rehabilitation in Motor Impairment.Brain & NeuroRehabilitation · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrea CremaTranslational Neural Engineering Laboratory, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Campus Biotech, EPFL, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4451-1817
Ivan FurfaroTranslational Neural Engineering Laboratory, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Campus Biotech, EPFL, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6077-3257
Flavio RaschellàTranslational Neural Engineering Laboratory, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Campus Biotech, EPFL, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7228-0791
Mauro RossiniCentro di Riabilitazione "Villa Beretta", Unità Complessa di Medicina Riabilitativa Ospedale Valduce, 23845 Costa Masnaga, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-5758
Johannes ZajcOttobock HealthCare Products GmbH, 1110 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-1502
Constantin WiesenerTechnische Universität Berlin, Fachgebiet Regelungssysteme, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0795-2306
Walter BaccinelliABACUS s.r.l., 20155 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8888-4792
Davide ProserpioCentro di Riabilitazione "Villa Beretta", Unità Complessa di Medicina Riabilitativa Ospedale Valduce, 23845 Costa Masnaga, Italy.
Andreas AugstenAsklepios Neurological Clinic Falkenstein, 61462 Königstein-Falkenstein, Germany.
Nancy ImmickAsklepios Neurological Clinic Falkenstein, 61462 Königstein-Falkenstein, Germany.
Sebastian BeckerHASOMED GmbH, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany.
Matthias WeberHASOMED GmbH, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany.
Thomas SchauerTechnische Universität Berlin, Fachgebiet Regelungssysteme, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0865-4418
Karsten KrakowAsklepios Neurological Clinic Falkenstein, 61462 Königstein-Falkenstein, Germany.
Giulio GasperiniCentro di Riabilitazione "Villa Beretta", Unità Complessa di Medicina Riabilitativa Ospedale Valduce, 23845 Costa Masnaga, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-3246
Franco MolteniCentro di Riabilitazione "Villa Beretta", Unità Complessa di Medicina Riabilitativa Ospedale Valduce, 23845 Costa Masnaga, Italy.
Michael Friedrich RussoldOttobock HealthCare Products GmbH, 1110 Vienna, Austria.
Maria BulgheroniABACUS s.r.l., 20155 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8484-9834
Silvestro MiceraTranslational Neural Engineering Laboratory, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Campus Biotech, EPFL, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Ospedale Valduce · ITAsklepios Neurologische Klinik Falkenstein · DEWyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering · CHHasomed (Germany) · DEOttobock (Austria) · ATTechnische Universität Berlin · DEScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology 644721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enriched environments and tools are believed to promote grasp rehabilitation after stroke. We designed S2, an interactive grasp rehabilitation system consisting of smart objects, custom orthoses for selective grasp constraining, and an electrode array system for forearm NMES. Motor improvements and perceived usability of a new enriched upper limb training system for sub-acute stroke patients was assessed in this interim analysis. INCLUSION CRITERIA: sub-acute stroke patients with MMSE>20, ipsilesional MI>80%, and contralesional MI<80%. Effects of 30-min therapy supplements, conventional vs. S2 prototype, are compared through a parallel two-arms dose-matched open-label trial, lasting 27 sessions. Clinical centres: Asklepios Neurologische Klinik Falkenstein, Königstein im Taunus, Germany, and Clinica Villa Beretta, Costa Masnaga, Italy. Assessment scales: ARAT, System Usability, and Technology Acceptance. METHODOLOGY: 26 participants were block randomized, allocated to the study (control N=12, experimental N=14) and underwent the training protocol. Among them, 11 participants with ARAT score at inclusion below 35, n = 6 in the experimental group, and n = 5 in the control group were analysed.

resultsparticipants in the enriched treatment group displayed a larger improvement in the ARAT scale (+14.9 pts, pval=0.0494). Perceived usability differed between clinics. No adverse effect was observed in relation to the treatments. Trial status: closed.

conclusionsThe S2 system, developed according to shared clinical directives, was tested in a clinical proof of concept. Variations of ARAT scores confirm the feasibility of clinical investigation for hand rehabilitation after stroke.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationExercise TherapyHand StrengthHumansRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremitygraspinteractiverehabilitationstrokesub-acute

Identifiers

PMID34695957
PMCPMC8538703
OpenAlexW3205721696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.