Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34695927›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Improved Random Forest Algorithm Based on Decision Paths for Fault Diagnosis of Chemical Process with Incomplete Data.

Yuequn Zhang, Lei Luo, Xu Ji, Yiyang Dai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuequn ZhangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8194-5406
Lei LuoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Xu JiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1005-7401
Yiyang DaiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-9160
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 21706220Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2021YFS0301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) has received considerable attention with the advent of big data. Many data-driven FDD procedures have been proposed, but most of them may not be accurate when data missing occurs. Therefore, this paper proposes an improved random forest (RF) based on decision paths, named DPRF, utilizing correction coefficients to compensate for the influence of incomplete data. In this DPRF model, intact training samples are firstly used to grow all the decision trees in the RF. Then, for each test sample that possibly contains missing values, the decision paths and the corresponding nodes importance scores are obtained, so that for each tree in the RF, the reliability score for the sample can be inferred. Thus, the prediction results of each decision tree for the sample will be assigned to certain reliability scores. The final prediction result is obtained according to the majority voting law, combining both the predicting results and the corresponding reliability scores. To prove the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method, the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process is tested. Compared with other FDD methods, the proposed DPRF model shows better performance on incomplete data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBig DataChemical PhenomenaReproducibility of Resultsdecision pathfault diagnosisincomplete datarandom forestreliability scores

Identifiers

PMID34695927
PMCPMC8538123
OpenAlexW3205788673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.