Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34695925›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

3D Object Detection with SLS-Fusion Network in Foggy Weather Conditions.

Nguyen Anh Minh Mai, Pierre Duthon, Louahdi Khoudour, Alain Crouzil, Sergio A Velastin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nguyen Anh Minh MaiCerema, Equipe-Projet STI, 1 Avenue du Colonel Roche, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9672-8909
Pierre DuthonCerema, Equipe-Projet STI, 8-10, Rue Bernard Palissy, 63017 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6705-1131
Louahdi KhoudourCerema, Equipe-Projet STI, 1 Avenue du Colonel Roche, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-4302
Alain CrouzilInstitut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, UPS, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-2978
Sergio A VelastinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, 28911 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6775-7137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of sensors such as cameras or LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) is crucial for the environmental awareness of self-driving cars. However, the data collected from these sensors are subject to distortions in extreme weather conditions such as fog, rain, and snow. This issue could lead to many safety problems while operating a self-driving vehicle. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of fog on the detection of objects in driving scenes and then to propose methods for improvement. Collecting and processing data in adverse weather conditions is often more difficult than data in good weather conditions. Hence, a synthetic dataset that can simulate bad weather conditions is a good choice to validate a method, as it is simpler and more economical, before working with a real dataset. In this paper, we apply fog synthesis on the public KITTI dataset to generate the Multifog KITTI dataset for both images and point clouds. In terms of processing tasks, we test our previous 3D object detector based on LiDAR and camera, named the Spare LiDAR Stereo Fusion Network (SLS-Fusion), to see how it is affected by foggy weather conditions. We propose to train using both the original dataset and the augmented dataset to improve performance in foggy weather conditions while keeping good performance under normal conditions. We conducted experiments on the KITTI and the proposed Multifog KITTI datasets which show that, before any improvement, performance is reduced by 42.67% in 3D object detection for Moderate objects in foggy weather conditions. By using a specific strategy of training, the results significantly improved by 26.72% and keep performing quite well on the original dataset with a drop only of 8.23%. In summary, fog often causes the failure of 3D detection on driving scenes. By additional training with the augmented dataset, we significantly improve the performance of the proposed 3D object detection algorithm for self-driving cars in foggy weather conditions.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingAlgorithmsRainResearch DesignWeather3D object detectionadverse weather conditionsautonomous vehiclesfoggy perceptionsynthetic datasets

Identifiers

PMID34695925
PMCPMC8540926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.