Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34695661›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2022

Anisotropic elastic behavior of a hydrogel-coated electrospun polyurethane: Suitability for heart valve leaflets.

Shruti Motiwale, Madeleine D Russell, Olivia Conroy, John Carruth, Megan Wancura, Andrew Robinson, Elizabeth Cosgriff-Hernandez, Michael S Sacks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A novel diffusion tensor based three-dimensional constitutive model for human breast tissue.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A computational framework to optimize the mechanical behavior of synthetic vascular grafts.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shruti MotiwaleJames T. Willerson Center for Cardiovascular Modeling and Simulation, The Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Madeleine D RussellJames T. Willerson Center for Cardiovascular Modeling and Simulation, The Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Olivia ConroyJames T. Willerson Center for Cardiovascular Modeling and Simulation, The Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
John CarruthJames T. Willerson Center for Cardiovascular Modeling and Simulation, The Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Megan WancuraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Andrew RobinsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Elizabeth Cosgriff-HernandezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Michael S SacksJames T. Willerson Center for Cardiovascular Modeling and Simulation, The Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. Electronic address: msacks@oden.utexas.edu.

Funding

Biomechanical indicators of bicuspid aortic valve dysfunctionR01HL142504 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI GORMAN, ROBERT C, HSU, MING-CHEN · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
Novel Simulation Technologies for BHV Long-Term DurabilityR01HL129077 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HUGHES, THOMAS J., MANNING, KEEFE B · 2016 to 2019
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL129077NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although xenograft biomaterials have been used for decades in replacement heart valves, they continue to face multiple limitations, including limited durability, mineralization, and restricted design space due to their biological origins. These issues necessitate the need for novel replacement heart valve biomaterials that are durable, non-thrombogenic, and compatible with transcatheter aortic valve replacement devices. In this study, we explored the suitability of an electrospun poly(carbonate urethane) (ES-PCU) mesh coated with a poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogel as a synthetic biomaterial for replacement heart valve leaflets. In this material design, the mesh provides the mechanical support, while the hydrogel provides the required surface hemocompatibility. We conducted a comprehensive study to characterize the structural and mechanical properties of the uncoated mesh as well as the hydrogel-coated mesh (composite biomaterial) over the estimated operational range. We found that the composite biomaterial was functionally robust with reproducible stress-strain behavior within and beyond the functional ranges for replacement heart valves, and was able to withstand the rigors of mechanical evaluation without any observable damage. In addition, the composite biomaterial displayed a wide range of mechanical anisotropic responses, which were governed by fiber orientation of the mesh, which in turn, was controlled with the fabrication process. Finally, we developed a novel constitutive modeling approach to predict the mechanical behavior of the composite biomaterial under in-plane extension and shear deformation modes. This model identified the existence of fiber-fiber mechanical interactions in the mesh that have not previously been reported. Interestingly, there was no evidence of fiber-hydrogel mechanical interactions. This important finding suggests that the hydrogel coating can be optimized for hemocompatibility independent of the structural mechanical responses required by the leaflet. This initial study indicated that the composite biomaterial has mechanical properties well-suited for replacement heart valve applications and that the electrospun mesh microarchitecture and hydrogel biological properties can be optimized independently. It also reveals that the structural mechanisms contributing to the mechanical response are more complicated than what was previously established and paves the pathway for more detailed future studies.

Indexed as

HydrogelsPolyurethanesHeart ValvesHydrogelsPolyurethanesElectrospun biomaterialsFiber–fiber interactionsReplacement heart valves

Identifiers

PMID34695661
PMCPMC8818123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.