ArticleBrain and language2021
Abnormally weak functional connections get stronger in chronic stroke patients who benefit from naming therapy.
Article in Brain and language, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network flexibility facilitates treatment-induced recovery in post-stroke aphasia.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Dynamic functional reorganization in post-stroke aphasia: a state-of-the-art fMRI review from disease evolution to intervention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Article
- Using unsupervised dimensionality reduction to identify lesion patterns predictive of post-stroke aphasia severity.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025Article
- Unveiling Cognitive Interference: fNIRS Insights Into Poststroke Aphasia During Stroop Tasks.Neural plasticity · 2025Article
- Resting-state brain network connectivity is an independent predictor of responsiveness to language therapy in chronic post-stroke aphasia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024Article
- Insights gained over 60 years on factors shaping post-stroke aphasia recovery: A commentary on Vignolo (1964).Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024Article
- Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Burden: An Independent Biomarker for Anomia Treatment Responsiveness in Chronic Stroke Patients With Aphasia.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Understanding, facilitating and predicting aphasia recovery after rehabilitation.International journal of speech-language pathology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Language recovery in aphasia is likely supported by a network of brain regions, but few studies have investigated treatment-related changes in functional connectivity while controlling for the absence of treatment. We examined functional connectivity in a 38-region picture-naming network in 30 patients with chronic aphasia who did or did not receive naming therapy. Compared to healthy controls, patients had abnormally low connectivity in a subset of connections from the naming network. Linear mixed models showed that the connectivity of abnormal connections increased significantly in patients who benefited from therapy, but not in those who did not benefit from or receive therapy. Changes in responders were specific to abnormal connections and did not extend to the larger network. Thus, successful naming therapy was associated with increased connectivity in connections that were abnormal prior to treatment. The potential to strengthen such connections may be a prerequisite for a successful treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.