Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34695169›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Enabling access to molecular monitoring for chronic myeloid leukemia patients is cost effective in China.

Vikalp Kumar Maheshwari, Cassandra Slader, Nidhi Dani, Christina Gkitzia, Quan Yuan, Tengbin Xiong, Yu Liu, Ricardo Viana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vikalp Kumar MaheshwariNBS CONEXTS-Value & Access, Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Cassandra SladerNovartis Pharma AG, Medical Affairs, Basel, Basel Stadt, Switzerland.
Nidhi DaniNovartis Pharma AG, Value & Access, Basel, Basel Stadt, Switzerland.
Christina GkitziaNovartis Pharma AG, Value & Access, Basel, Basel Stadt, Switzerland.
Quan YuanNovartis Oncology, Market Access Strategy, Beijing, China.
Tengbin XiongNovartis Oncology, Novartis Campus, Shanghai, China.
Yu LiuNovartis Oncology, Medical Affairs, Beijing, China.
Ricardo VianaNovartis Pharma AG, Global Value & Access, Oncology, Basel, Basel Stadt, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9261-6942
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (China) · CNNovartis (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the cost effectiveness of molecular monitoring in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP) compared to no molecular monitoring from a Chinese payer perspective.

methodsAnalyses were conducted using a semi-Markov model with a 50-year time horizon. Population data from multicenter registry-based studies of Chinese patients with CML-CP informed the model. Transition probabilities were based on time-to-event data from the literature. Utility values were obtained from published studies and were assumed to be the same for patients with and without molecular monitoring. Costs were based on values commonly used in the Chinese healthcare system, including drug acquisition, drug administration, follow-up, treatment for disease progression, molecular monitoring, and terminal care costs, and were in the local currency (2020 Chinese Yuan RMB [¥]). Outcomes were total life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

resultsMolecular monitoring was dominant to no molecular monitoring, with increased LYs (1.52) and QALYs (1.90) and costs savings (¥93,840) over a lifetime compared to no monitoring in discounted analyses. The opportunity of patients that receive molecular monitoring to discontinue treatment during treatment-free remission, an opportunity not afforded to those without molecular monitoring, was the principle driver of this result. Results were similar across multiple clinical scenarios. Particularly, molecular monitoring remained dominant even if the proportion of patients achieving deep molecular response (DMR) was reduced by 10%-30%, or the proportion of patients maintaining DMR for 1 year was reduced by 10%-30% or increased by 10%. Cost savings in these scenarios ranged from ¥62,230 to ¥103,964.

conclusionsOverall, this analysis demonstrates that adherence to guideline recommendations of regular molecular monitoring of patients with CML-CP treated with TKIs provides significant clinical benefit that leads to substantial cost savings compared to no molecular monitoring from the perspective of a Chinese payer. In a time where healthcare systems have limited resources to allocate to optimal patient care, investment in molecular monitoring is an ideal choice for improving patient benefits at a reduced cost.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsChinaCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34695169
PMCPMC8544861
OpenAlexW3209504350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.