ArticlePLoS medicine2021
Medical journal requirements for clinical trial data sharing: Ripe for improvement.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Open Science Policies and Practices Among Medical Journals.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Improving the reports of systematic reviews in sexual medicine.The journal of sexual medicine · 2025Article
- A survey on UK researchers' views regarding their experiences with the de-identification, anonymisation, release methods and re-identification risk estimation for clinical trial datasets.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Article
- Medical researchers' perception of sharing of metadata from case report forms.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Indicators of transparency and data sharing in scientific writing in published randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals between 2019 and 2023: an empirical study.European journal of orthodontics · 2024Article
- Reporting on data sharing: executive position of the EQUATOR Network.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Promoting Data Sharing: The Moral Obligations of Public Funding Agencies.Science and engineering ethics · 2024Article
- Evaluating the discoverability of supporting research materials in ClinicalTrials.gov for US federally funded COVID-19 clinical studies.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2024Article
- Expanding the data Ark: an attempt to make the data from highly cited social science papers publicly available.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- The Costs of Anonymization: Case Study Using Clinical Data.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Article
- Ten (not so) simple rules for clinical trial data-sharing.PLoS computational biology · 2023Review
- Implementing clinical trial data sharing requires training a new generation of biomedical researchers.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Data Sharing and Reanalyses Among Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Surgical Journals Before and After Adoption of a Data Availability and Reproducibility Policy.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Regulatory Frameworks for Clinical Trial Data Sharing: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Compliance with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors policy on individual participant data sharing in clinical trial registries: An audit.Perspectives in clinical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Florian Naudet and co-authors discuss strengthening requirements for sharing clinical trial data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.