Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34695111›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

OutbreakFlow: Model-based Bayesian inference of disease outbreak dynamics with invertible neural networks and its application to the COVID-19 pandemics in Germany.

Stefan T Radev, Frederik Graw, Simiao Chen, Nico T Mutters, Vanessa M Eichel, Till Bärnighausen, Ullrich Köthe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Estimation of age-stratified contact rates during the COVID-19 pandemic using a novel inference algorithm.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefan T RadevInstitute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6702-9559
Frederik GrawBioQuant - Center for Quantitative Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1198-6632
Simiao ChenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0555-2157
Nico T MuttersInstitute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0156-9595
Vanessa M EichelCenter of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3259-2920
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-4212
Ullrich KötheComputer Vision and Learning Lab, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6036-1287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models in epidemiology are an indispensable tool to determine the dynamics and important characteristics of infectious diseases. Apart from their scientific merit, these models are often used to inform political decisions and interventional measures during an ongoing outbreak. However, reliably inferring the epidemical dynamics by connecting complex models to real data is still hard and requires either laborious manual parameter fitting or expensive optimization methods which have to be repeated from scratch for every application of a given model. In this work, we address this problem with a novel combination of epidemiological modeling with specialized neural networks. Our approach entails two computational phases: In an initial training phase, a mathematical model describing the epidemic is used as a coach for a neural network, which acquires global knowledge about the full range of possible disease dynamics. In the subsequent inference phase, the trained neural network processes the observed data of an actual outbreak and infers the parameters of the model in order to realistically reproduce the observed dynamics and reliably predict future progression. With its flexible framework, our simulation-based approach is applicable to a variety of epidemiological models. Moreover, since our method is fully Bayesian, it is designed to incorporate all available prior knowledge about plausible parameter values and returns complete joint posterior distributions over these parameters. Application of our method to the early Covid-19 outbreak phase in Germany demonstrates that we are able to obtain reliable probabilistic estimates for important disease characteristics, such as generation time, fraction of undetected infections, likelihood of transmission before symptom onset, and reporting delays using a very moderate amount of real-world observations.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerBayes TheoremCOVID-19GermanyHumansPandemicsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID34695111
PMCPMC8584772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.