Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34695108›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Towards soil-transmitted helminths transmission interruption: The impact of diagnostic tools on infection prediction in a low intensity setting in Southern Mozambique.

Berta Grau-Pujol, Helena Martí-Soler, Valdemiro Escola, Maria Demontis, Jose Carlos Jamine, Javier Gandasegui, Osvaldo Muchisse, Maria Cambra-Pellejà, Anelsio Cossa, Maria Martinez-Valladares and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Estimation of the Parasitic Burden of Soil-Transmitted Helminths Among Pregnant Women in the Maharashtra State of India Using qPCR: A Community-Based Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Berta Grau-PujolBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7320-0965
Helena Martí-SolerBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7127-205X
Valdemiro EscolaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0001-9424-7503
Maria DemontisDepartment of Parasitology, Centre of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jose Carlos JamineCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Javier GandaseguiInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Grulleros, León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5519-738X
Osvaldo MuchisseCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0001-5226-4858
Maria Cambra-PellejàInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Grulleros, León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8898-992X
Anelsio CossaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Maria Martinez-ValladaresInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Grulleros, León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3723-1895
Charfudin SacoorCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Lisette Van LieshoutDepartment of Parasitology, Centre of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8170-1172
Jorge CanoExpanded Special Project for Elimination of NTDs, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, The Republic of the Congo.ORCID 0000-0001-9864-5058
Emanuele GiorgiCentre for Health Informatics, Computing and Statistics, Lancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0640-181X
Jose MuñozBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Manhiça Health Research Centre · MZInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña · ESBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESLeiden University Medical Center · NLLancaster University · GBWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CG

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

World Health Organization goals against soil-transmitted helminthiases (STH) are pointing towards seeking their elimination as a public health problem: reducing to less than 2% the proportion of moderate and heavy infections. Some regions are reaching WHO goals, but transmission could rebound if strategies are discontinued without an epidemiological evaluation. For that, sensitive diagnostic methods to detect low intensity infections and localization of ongoing transmission are crucial. In this work, we estimated and compared the STH infection as obtained by different diagnostic methods in a low intensity setting. We conducted a cross-sectional study enrolling 792 participants from a district in Mozambique. Two stool samples from two consecutive days were collected from each participant. Samples were analysed by Telemann, Kato-Katz and qPCR for STH detection. We evaluated diagnostic sensitivity using a composite reference standard. By geostatistical methods, we estimated neighbourhood prevalence of at least one STH infection for each diagnostic method. We used environmental, demographical and socioeconomical indicators to account for any existing spatial heterogeneity in infection. qPCR was the most sensitive technique compared to composite reference standard: 92% (CI: 83%- 97%) for A. lumbricoides, 95% (CI: 88%- 98%) for T. trichiura and 95% (CI: 91%- 97%) for hookworm. qPCR also estimated the highest neighbourhood prevalences for at least one STH infection in a low intensity setting. While 10% of the neighbourhoods showed a prevalence above 20% when estimating with single Kato-Katz from one stool and Telemann from one stool, 86% of the neighbourhoods had a prevalence above 20% when estimating with qPCR. In low intensity settings, STH estimated prevalence of infection may be underestimated if based on Kato-Katz. qPCR diagnosis outperformed the microscopy methods. Thus, implementation of qPCR based predictive maps at STH control and elimination programmes would disclose hidden transmission and facilitate targeted interventions for transmission interruption.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFemaleHelminthiasisHelminthsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMozambiqueSoil

Identifiers

PMID34695108
PMCPMC8568186
OpenAlexW3211012197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.