Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694989›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2022

Differences between subjective and objective sleep duration according to actual sleep duration and sleep-disordered breathing: the Nagahama Study.

Naomi Takahashi, Takeshi Matsumoto, Yoshinari Nakatsuka, Kimihiko Murase, Yasuharu Tabara, Hirofumi Takeyama, Takuma Minami, Satoshi Hamada, Osamu Kanai, Kiminobu Tanizawa and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. NOP agonist AT-403 promoted sleep in lactic acid-induced acute pain model.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Naomi TakahashiDepartment of Respiratory Care and Sleep Control Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeshi MatsumotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshinari NakatsukaDepartment of Respiratory Care and Sleep Control Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kimihiko MuraseDepartment of Respiratory Care and Sleep Control Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuharu TabaraCenter for Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hirofumi TakeyamaDepartment of Respiratory Care and Sleep Control Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuma MinamiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Satoshi HamadaDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Respiratory Failure, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Osamu KanaiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kiminobu TanizawaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Isuzu NakamotoNursing Science, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takahisa KawaguchiCenter for Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuya SetohCenter for Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takanobu TsutsumiCenter for Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshimitsu TakahashiDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohiro HandaDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Respiratory Failure, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomoko WakamuraNursing Science, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoko KomenamiDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Kyoto Women's University, Kyoto, Japan.
Satoshi MoritaDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Toyohiro HiraiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Fumihiko MatsudaCenter for Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeo NakayamaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuo ChinCenter for Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Nagahama Study Group
Kyoto University · JPGTx (United States) · USKyoto Women's University · JPOsaka Kaisei Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesSince subjective sleep duration (SSD) is considered to be longer than objective sleep duration (OSD), results of SSD minus OSD (SSD-OSD) might always be thought to be positive. Some recent reports showed different results, but exact results have not been obtained. The difference between SSD and OSD may change according to OSD. We investigated this difference and its association with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) or nonrestorative sleep.

methodsThis cross-sectional study evaluated 6,908 community residents in Nagahama, Japan. SSD was determined by self-administered questionnaire. OSD was measured by wrist actigraphy and sleep diary. SDB was assessed according to the 3% oxygen desaturation index adjusted for OSD.

resultsWorthy of notice was that SSD was shorter than OSD for those with SSD longer than 6.98 hours in all participants, 7.36 hours in males, and 6.80 hours in females. However, SSD was longer than OSD (mean ± SD: 6.49 ± 1.07 vs 6.01 ± 0.96;

conclusionsWhen OSD was slightly less than 7 (6.98) hours, participants reported or perceived SSD > OSD. When OSD was > 6.98 hours, participants reported or perceived SSD < OSD. Patients with SDB reported longer SSD than OSD according to severity of SDB. Evaluating SSD, OSD, and their differences may be useful for managing sleep disturbances, including nonrestorative sleep. CITATION: Takahashi N, Matsumoto T, Nakatsuka Y, et al. Differences between subjective and objective sleep duration according to actual sleep duration and sleep-disordered breathing: the Nagahama Study.

Indexed as

Sleep Apnea SyndromesActigraphyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOxygenSleepOxygenactigraphyobjective sleep durationsleep-disordered breathingsubjective sleep duration

Identifiers

PMID34694989
PMCPMC8883084
OpenAlexW3210808143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.