ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2021
Automated Extraction of Tumor Staging and Diagnosis Information From Surgical Pathology Reports.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Secure, Scalable Large Language Model-Based System (CIDER) for High-Throughput Clinical Data Extraction From Medical Reports: Retrospective Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Adapting transformer-based encoder models for automated billing code assignment of current procedural terminology from pathology reports in multi-institutional settings.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Cancer staging data collection using rules-based natural language processing for entity extraction from pathology notifications: the WA cancer staging project.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in multidisciplinary tumor boards enhancing decision making and clinical outcomes in oncology.iScience · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing gastrointestinal cancer research with artificial intelligence: From precision patient stratification to real-world evidence.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Supporting cancer research on real-world data: extracting colorectal cancer status and explicitly written TNM stages from free-text imaging and histopathology reports.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Development and Evaluation of Natural Language Processing Methods for Extracting Key Melanoma Pathology Concepts.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2025Article
- Improving Discrete Documentation of Cancer Staging-An Alert-Free Approach.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence to unlock real-world evidence in clinical oncology: A primer on recent advances.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- A natural language processing algorithm accurately classifies steatotic liver disease pathology to estimate the risk of cirrhosis.Hepatology communications · 2024Article
- Applications of natural language processing tools in the surgical journey.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- Natural Language Processing for Breast Imaging: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Supporting Structured Data Capture for Patients With Cancer: An Initiative of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Survivorship Program to Improve Capture of Malignant Diagnosis and Cancer Staging Data.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTypically stored as unstructured notes, surgical pathology reports contain data elements valuable to cancer research that require labor-intensive manual extraction. Although studies have described natural language processing (NLP) of surgical pathology reports to automate information extraction, efforts have focused on specific cancer subtypes rather than across multiple oncologic domains. To address this gap, we developed and evaluated an NLP method to extract tumor staging and diagnosis information across multiple cancer subtypes.
methodsThe NLP pipeline was implemented on an open-source framework called Leo. We used a total of 555,681 surgical pathology reports of 329,076 patients to develop the pipeline and evaluated our approach on subsets of reports from patients with breast, prostate, colorectal, and randomly selected cancer subtypes.
resultsAveraged across all four cancer subtypes, the NLP pipeline achieved an accuracy of 1.00 for International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes, 0.89 for T staging, 0.90 for N staging, and 0.97 for M staging. It achieved an F1 score of 1.00 for International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes, 0.88 for T staging, 0.90 for N staging, and 0.24 for M staging.
conclusionThe NLP pipeline was developed to extract tumor staging and diagnosis information across multiple cancer subtypes to support the research enterprise in our institution. Although it was not possible to demonstrate generalizability of our NLP pipeline to other institutions, other institutions may find value in adopting a similar NLP approach-and reusing code available at GitHub-to support the oncology research enterprise with elements extracted from surgical pathology reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.