Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694707›Full record

ArticleIET nanobiotechnology2021

A comparative study on chitosan nanoparticle synthesis methodologies for application in aquaculture through toxicity studies.

Subashni Bhoopathy, Dhinakaraswamy Inbakandan, Rajendran Thirugnanasambandam, Chandrasekaran Kumar, Pavithra Sampath, Ramalingam Bethunaickan, Vasantharaja Raguraman, Ganesh Kumar Vijayakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET nanobiotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Subashni BhoopathyCentre for Ocean Research (DST-FIST Sponsored Centre), MoES-Earth Science & Technology Cell (Marine Biotechnological Studies), Col. Dr. Jeppiaar Research Park, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
Dhinakaraswamy InbakandanCentre for Ocean Research (DST-FIST Sponsored Centre), MoES-Earth Science & Technology Cell (Marine Biotechnological Studies), Col. Dr. Jeppiaar Research Park, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2514-6658
Rajendran ThirugnanasambandamCentre for Ocean Research (DST-FIST Sponsored Centre), MoES-Earth Science & Technology Cell (Marine Biotechnological Studies), Col. Dr. Jeppiaar Research Park, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
Chandrasekaran KumarCentre for Ocean Research (DST-FIST Sponsored Centre), MoES-Earth Science & Technology Cell (Marine Biotechnological Studies), Col. Dr. Jeppiaar Research Park, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
Pavithra SampathDepartment of Immunology, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Ramalingam BethunaickanDepartment of Immunology, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Vasantharaja RaguramanCentre for Ocean Research (DST-FIST Sponsored Centre), MoES-Earth Science & Technology Cell (Marine Biotechnological Studies), Col. Dr. Jeppiaar Research Park, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
Ganesh Kumar VijayakumarCentre for Ocean Research (DST-FIST Sponsored Centre), MoES-Earth Science & Technology Cell (Marine Biotechnological Studies), Col. Dr. Jeppiaar Research Park, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) have been recently used for various applications in aquaculture, especially as drug carriers. The aim of this study was to synthesise and investigate a superlative method of CSNP synthesis for application in aquaculture through aquaculture-based toxicology screening methods. Two different methods were analysed: the first a direct ionic gelation method (A) and the other involving a low-molecular-weight chitosan microparticle intermediate method (B). Dynamic light scattering characterisation revealed that the CSNP particle sizes were 192.7 ± 11.8 and 22.9 nm from methods A and B, respectively. The LC

Indexed as

ChitosanNanoparticlesAnimalsAquacultureDrug CarriersZebrafishChitosanDrug Carriers

Identifiers

PMID34694707
PMCPMC8675861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.