Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694682›Full record

ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society2022

Kidney transplant recipients' attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and barriers and enablers to vaccine acceptance.

Dhakshayini Tharmaraj, Claire Dendle, Kevan R Polkinghorne, William R Mulley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Kidney transplant recipients' attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and barriers and enablers to vaccine acceptance.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dhakshayini TharmarajDepartment of Nephrology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0753-1272
Claire DendleDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6642-5365
Kevan R PolkinghorneDepartment of Nephrology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
William R MulleyDepartment of Nephrology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Monash Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify barriers and enablers to COVID-19 vaccination in renal transplant recipients who are undecided about vaccination.

methodsAn online survey was distributed to 876 adult kidney transplant recipients at a tertiary referral service, who had not been vaccinated against COVID-19. The survey assessed willingness to be vaccinated, attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines, and barriers and enablers to proceeding with vaccination.

resultsThe survey response rate was 54% (473/876). Three hundred and forty-six (73.1%) participants planned to receive vaccination (yes group), 105 (22.2%) were undecided, and 22 (4.7%) refused vaccination. The undecided group were younger but were not different in other demographic characteristics to the yes group. The undecided group were less positive toward (34.29% vs. 91.3%, p < .001) and more concerned about (93.3% vs. 25.1%, p < .001) vaccination than the yes group. Their concerns related to vaccine safety (including harm to their transplant), poor efficacy, and a lack of rigorous testing in transplant recipients. Undecided recipients had received less vaccine-specific information from medical specialists than the yes group. Most undecided participants (95.1%) were willing to proceed with vaccination with appropriate supports. The most desired supports were information and a recommendation to proceed with vaccination from their treating transplant specialist and team. CONCLUSION(S): Concerns about vaccine safety (including harm to transplant), poor vaccine efficacy, and lack of rigorous testing were barriers to vaccine uptake. Most undecided recipients would proceed with vaccination with specific recommendations and vaccine information provided by their transplant specialist/team. These simple interventions can be readily implemented to optimize vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19Kidney TransplantationVaccinesAdultAttitudeCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2Transplant RecipientsVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesrenal transplantationSARS-CoV2 vaccinevaccination promotionvaccine hesitancyvaccine intentionvaccine refusal

Identifiers

PMID34694682
PMCPMC8646313
OpenAlexW3209922541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.