Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694602›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Predicting RNA Secondary Structure Using In Vitro and In Vivo Data.

Riccardo Delli Ponti, Gian Gaetano Tartaglia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Riccardo Delli PontiSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Gian Gaetano TartagliaCenter for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy. gian.tartaglia@iit.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new flow of high-throughput RNA secondary structure data coming from different techniques allowed the further development of machine learning approaches. We developed CROSS and CROSSalive, two algorithms trained on experimental data able to predict the RNA secondary structure propensity both in vitro and in vivo. Since the in vivo folding of RNA molecules depends on multiple factors due to the cellular crowded environment, prediction is a complex problem that needs additional calculations for the interaction with proteins and other molecules. In the following chapter, we will describe the differences in predicting RNA secondary structure propensity using experimental data as input for an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in vitro and in vivo.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerMachine LearningProtein Structure, SecondaryRNARNAArtificial neural networksMachine learningRNA secondary structureRNA structure in vivoSHAPE

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.