Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694594›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2022

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Helicobacter pylori for Gastric Cancer Prevention: a Systematic Review.

Maryam Sarmasti, Manouchehr Khoshbaten, Farhad Khalili, Mahmood Yousefi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06216639 (EU4Health Project Eurohelican), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06216639 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

EU4Health Project Eurohelican: A Single-center Prospective Feasibility Study of the Proposed Test-and-treat Preventive Screening Program in Younger Slovenian Participants Aged 30-34 Years With or Without Helicobacter Pylori Infection

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Public Health, SloveniaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled2,000ConditionsHelicobacter Pylori InfectionArmsBismuth Subcitrate, Esomeprazole, Metronidazole, Amoxicillin, Clarithromycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maryam SarmastiDepartment of Health Economics, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Manouchehr KhoshbatenLiver and Gastrointestinal Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Farhad KhaliliDepartment of Health Economics, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mahmood YousefiDepartment of Health Economics, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Mahmoodyousefi59@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-5040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, prevalence of Helicobacter pylori is around 50%, and it has a directly proportional relationship with gastric cancer. Screening and treatment of Helicobacter pylori could reduce gastric cancer by 35%. Drawing on the scarce resources, it is reasonable to use the most cost-effectiveness Helicobacter pylori screening procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Helicobacter pylori screening techniques and to specify the efficient technique from a cost-effectiveness perspective. This systematic review was conducted via searching electronic databases including Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Reviews. Our search retrieved 904 articles, of which, 606 full-text studies have been selected after duplicate removal. Next, the 25 articles were sorted based on eligibility criteria and quality appraisal; eventually, only eight studies have been included for analysis. We reported the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) screening compared to non-screening and different screening strategies. Eight studies were identified and retained for the final analysis. In this study, when screening techniques were compared to no-screening, serology screening techniques showed to be cost-effective. The lowest ICER calculated was US$$1230 cost per life-year gained (LYG) and US$1500 cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). However, determining the optimal strategy compared to other strategies was depended on parameters such as context-specific, type of cost, threshold, and perspective, and also, it influenced by the framework of the cost-effectiveness analysis.

Indexed as

Helicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriStomach NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningGastric cancerHelicobacter pyloriIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioMarkov modelingScreening strategies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.