Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694590›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2022

The Involvement of the Posterior Cerebellum in Reconstructing and Predicting Social Action Sequences.

Frank Van Overwalle, Min Pu, Qianying Ma, Meijia Li, Naem Haihambo, Kris Baetens, Natacha Deroost, Chris Baeken, Elien Heleven

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Reward.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. One step too far: social cerebellum in norm-violating navigation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank Van OverwalleDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium. Frank.VanOverwalle@vub.be.
Min PuDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Qianying MaDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Meijia LiDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Naem HaihamboDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Kris BaetensDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Natacha DeroostDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Chris BaekenDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Elien HelevenDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Vrije Universiteit Brussel SRP57
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in social neuroscience have highlighted the critical role of the cerebellum and especially the posterior cerebellar Crus in social mentalizing (i.e., theory of mind). Research in the past 5 years has provided growing evidence supporting the view that the posterior cerebellum builds internal action models of our social interactions to predict how other people's actions will be executed, and what our most likely responses to these actions will be. This paper presents an overview of a series of fMRI experiments on novel tasks involving a combination of (a) the learning or generation of chronological sequences of social actions either in an explicit or implicit manner, which (b) require social mentalizing on another person's mental state such as goals, beliefs, and implied traits. Together, the results strongly confirm the central role of the posterior cerebellar Crus in identifying and automatizing action sequencing during social mentalizing, and in predicting future action sequences based on social mentalizing inferences about others. This research program has important implications: It provides for the first time (a) fruitful starting points for diagnosing and investigating social sequencing dysfunctions in a variety of mental disorders which have also been related to cerebellar dysfunctions, (b) provides the necessary tools for testing whether non-invasive neurostimulation targeting the posterior cerebellum has a causal effect on social functioning, and (c) whether these stimulation techniques and training programs guided by novel cerebellar social sequencing insights, can be exploited to increase posterior cerebellar plasticity in order to alleviate social impairments in mental disorders.

Indexed as

CerebellumMentalizationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAction predictionAction sequencingCrusFalse beliefsImplicit learningSocial metallizingTrait inferences

Identifiers

PMID34694590
OpenAlexW3209678543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.