ArticleOncology and therapy2021
Healthcare Costs Incurred by Patients with Multiple Myeloma Following Triple Class Exposure (TCE) in the US.
Article in Oncology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-infusion Costs Associated with Idecabtagene Vicleucel Treatment for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the KarMMa Trial.Advances in therapy · 2023Trial
- Ex Vivo Treatment Response Prediction in Multiple Myeloma: Assay Formats, Clinical Correlation, and Future Directions.Cancers · 2026Review
- Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and 1-3 Prior Lines of Therapy: Optum Database.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Navigating the Economic Burden of Multiple Myeloma: Insights into Cost-effectiveness of CAR-T and Bispecific Antibody Therapies.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025Review
- Economic Impact of Elranatamab for Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Article
- Health care costs among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with ixazomib or daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
- From Triple- to Penta-Exposed Multiple Myeloma: A Real-World Study in a Medicare Population.Oncology and therapy · 2024Article
- Health care resource utilization and costs among patients with multiple myeloma with exposure to double-class or triple-class multiple myeloma treatments: A retrospective US claims database analysis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Article
- Article
- Healthcare Costs of Multiple Myeloma Patients with Four or More Prior Lines of Therapy, Including Triple-Class Exposure in the United States.Oncology and therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of plasma cells; most MM patients will eventually relapse or become refractory to treatment. Treating MM patients remains a challenge since patients eventually progress through several lines of therapy (LOTs), requiring the use of multiple MM drug classes. We examined healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and the costs incurred by MM patients following triple class exposure (TCE; defined as exposure to a proteosome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and an anti-CD-38 antibody).
methodsAdult MM patients were selected from the MarketScan® commercial and Medicare supplemental databases (January 2009-February 2021). From this cohort, patients who had TCE and ≥ 1 subsequent LOT that occurred after January 1, 2017 were included in the study population. The initiation date for the first post-TCE LOT was defined as the index date. All-cause and MM-related HCRU and the associated costs were examined post-index date.
resultsA total of 85 MM patients with TCE who initiated ≥ 1 subsequent LOT post-TCE and had ≥ 1 year of follow-up post-index date were included in the study population; mean age on index date was 58.8 years, and 60.0% were male. The time from first-observed MM diagnosis until index date averaged 47.5 months. During an average follow-up of 20.9 months post-index date, 64.7% of patients (N = 55) initiated a second LOT and 35.2% (N = 30) received at least 3 LOTs. During follow-up, mean total all-cause healthcare cost per patient was $722,992 (equivalent to $34,578 per patient per month [PPPM]). Approximately 90.7% ($655,524 per patient) of the total all-cause healthcare costs were MM related, 66.0% of which were MM drug/infusion costs.
conclusionIn this real-world US study, MM patients with TCE incurred high healthcare costs, with the majority being MM related and primarily attributed to MM drug and infusion costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.