SynthesisNeuropsychology review2022
Characterising Demographic, Clinical and Functional Features of Cognitive Subgroups in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nutraceuticals in Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Sex differences in higher-order cognition in schizophrenia and unaffected first-degree relatives: a longitudinal, family study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- A confirmatory factor analysis of hyperfocusing and inhibitory control as separable cognitive domains in schizophrenia.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging-Based Subgroups in Schizophrenia: A Critical Appraisal of Clustering Studies.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Review
- Antipsychotic dose is not associated with cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia aged under 40: a cross-sectional observational study with retrospective dose estimation.BMC psychiatry · 2026Observational
- Negative association between cognitive functioning and antipsychotic DPsychological medicine · 2026Article
- Multimodal biological profiles of symptom-based subgroups in recent-onset psychosis.Research square · 2025Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Cognitive Subgroups of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Personalized Cognitive Health in Psychiatry: Current State and the Promise of Computational Methods.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Review
- Distinct multimodal biological and functional profiles of symptom-based subgroups in recent-onset psychosis.Research square · 2024Article
- Cognitive subgroups and the relationships with symptoms, psychosocial functioning and quality of life in first-episode non-affective psychosis: a cluster-analysis approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Social cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia: A cluster analysis.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2022Article
- Identifying and revealing different brain neural activities of cognitive subtypes in early course schizophrenia.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considerable cognitive heterogeneity is present within the schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) population. Several subgroups characterised by more homogenous cognitive profiles have been identified. It is not yet clear however, whether these subgroups represent different points along a continuum of cognitive symptom severity, or whether they reflect unique profiles of the disorder. One way to determine this is by comparing subgroups on their non-cognitive characteristics. The aim of the present review was to systematically summarise our current understanding of the non-cognitive features of the cognitive subgroups of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD). Thirty-five relevant studies were identified from January 1980 to March 2020. Cognitive subgroups were consistently compared on age, sex, education, age of illness onset, illness duration, positive, negative and disorganised symptoms, depression and psychosocial functioning. It was revealed that subgroups were consistently distinguished by education, negative symptom severity and degree of functional impairment; with subgroups characterised by worse cognitive functioning performing/rated worse on these characteristics. The lack of consistent subgroup differences for the majority of the non-cognitive characteristics provides partial support for the notion that cognitive subgrouping in SSD is not simply reflecting a rehash of previously identified clinical subtypes. However, as subgroups were consistently distinguished by three characteristics known to be associated with cognition, our understanding of the extent to which the cognitive subgrouping approach is representing separate subtypes versus subdivisions along a continuum of symptom severity is still not definitive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34694542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.