Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694459›Full record

ArticleHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2022

Real-world experience with the wearable cardioverter defibrillator: clinical effectiveness and wear-time adherence in patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death.

Christian Weth, Hasan Abuazab, Sebastian Ewen, Christian Ukena, Michael Böhm, Florian Custodis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian WethSecond Department of Medicine, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbruecken, Germany. cweth@klinikum-saarbruecken.de.
Hasan AbuazabSecond Department of Medicine, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbruecken, Germany.
Sebastian EwenDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Saarland University Hospital, University of the Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Christian UkenaDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Saarland University Hospital, University of the Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Michael BöhmDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Saarland University Hospital, University of the Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Florian CustodisSecond Department of Medicine, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbruecken, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies established a role for the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) to effectively and safely bridge temporary risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with advanced heart failure. The prognostic relevance of the WCD remains controversial.

objectivesThe authors investigated adherence to, as well as the safety and effectiveness of, WCD use in a real-world cohort of patients at high risk for SCD. MATERIAL AND

methodsAll consecutive patients (n = 83) receiving a WCD at a German tertiary care hospital between April 2012 and December 2019 were retrospectively included in this analysis. Patient characteristics were collected at the time of the index hospitalization. Using the Zoll® lifeVest® (ZOLL Medical Corporation, Chelmsford, MA, USA) network database, two separate investigators evaluated adherence to the WCD as well as arrhythmic events during WCD wear time.

resultsDuring 3680 wearing days (mean WCD wear time, 44 days) with a median daily wear time of 23.1 h, three arrhythmic events of relevance (sustained ventricular tachycardia, VT) occurred, one of which was sufficiently terminated by WCD shock. Another patient died from sudden cardiac death while pausing his WCD. Right bundle branch block correlated significantly with sustained VT occurrence (r = 0.3315; 95% CI -0.1265 to 0.3014; p = 0.0022). In 30 patients (36.1%) a cardioverter/defibrillator was implanted.

conclusionIn a real-life clinical setting, the use of WCD in patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death is effective and safe and adherence to the device is high. The event rate for VA was lower than in comparable patient cohorts. Adherence remains a crucial issue as one patient in the present series died while not wearing the device.

Indexed as

DefibrillatorsWearable Electronic DevicesDeath, Sudden, CardiacElectric CountershockHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCardiomyopathyHeart failureLife VestVentricular tachycardiaWearable electronic devices

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.