ArticleJournal of neurology2022
Influence of a clinical trial in the decision-making processes of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an incurable neurological disease, and patients diagnosed with ALS have a survival time of 2-5 years without life-sustaining therapy. Decision-making processes for the acceptance or decline of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and tracheostomy with invasive ventilation (TIV) therapy are complex and multifaceted. In this study, we examined whether participation or no participation in clinical trials of ALS had an influence on the decision-making processes of ALS patients.
methodsFifty-seven consecutive ALS participants were recruited. Two participants did not wish to participate in any clinical trials, and Twenty-two participants were enrolled in clinical trials. Twenty-three participants wished to participate but could not be enrolled in any of the clinical trials because they exceeded the number of participants in these trials or they met the exclusion criteria.
resultAt baseline, there was no significant difference in the preference rates for PEG and TIV between the participant and non-participant groups, but after the double-blind period/6 months, both preference rates were significantly higher in the non-participant group than in the participant group. Notably, the rate of preferred TIV in the participant group drastically decreased after the double-blind period. A single regression analysis revealed that participation in clinical trials had a strong influence on the change of TIV preference for 6 months.
conclusionParticipation in a clinical trial decreases the willingness to prolong life after the clinical trial. The present results are meaningful when designing clinical trials and discussing life-sustaining treatments with ALS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34694425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.