Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694399›Full record

ReviewGenome biology and evolution2021

ADAR Editing in Viruses: An Evolutionary Force to Reckon with.

Helen Piontkivska, Benjamin Wales-McGrath, Michael Miyamoto, Marta L Wayne

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Host response to Aplysia Abyssovirus 1 in nervous system and gill.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. ADAR Family Proteins: A Structural Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helen PiontkivskaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1844-864X
Benjamin Wales-McGrathDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Ohio, USA.
Michael MiyamotoDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Marta L WayneDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Kent State University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Gonadotropin Action on Cognition and Neuronal Remodeling in Aging and Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG054654 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CASADESUS, GEMMA · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
Characterization of transcriptome changes in diet-induced progression to METS/T2D to identify earliest and sex-specific neurodegenerative foci for AD developmentR21AG064479 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CASADESUS, GEMMA · 2019 to 2020
$598k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG064479NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG054654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenosine Deaminases that Act on RNA (ADARs) are RNA editing enzymes that play a dynamic and nuanced role in regulating transcriptome and proteome diversity. This editing can be highly selective, affecting a specific site within a transcript, or nonselective, resulting in hyperediting. ADAR editing is important for regulating neural functions and autoimmunity, and has a key role in the innate immune response to viral infections, where editing can have a range of pro- or antiviral effects and can contribute to viral evolution. Here we examine the role of ADAR editing across a broad range of viral groups. We propose that the effect of ADAR editing on viral replication, whether pro- or antiviral, is better viewed as an axis rather than a binary, and that the specific position of a given virus on this axis is highly dependent on virus- and host-specific factors, and can change over the course of infection. However, more research needs to be devoted to understanding these dynamic factors and how they affect virus-ADAR interactions and viral evolution. Another area that warrants significant attention is the effect of virus-ADAR interactions on host-ADAR interactions, particularly in light of the crucial role of ADAR in regulating neural functions. Answering these questions will be essential to developing our understanding of the relationship between ADAR editing and viral infection. In turn, this will further our understanding of the effects of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, as well as many others, and thereby influence our approach to treating these deadly diseases.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsEvolution, MolecularHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunityRNA, ViralRNA VirusesVirus ReplicationAdenosine DeaminaseRNA, Viraladenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) editingA-to-I editingimmune responseinterferonRNA editingRNA virusesSARS-CoV-2viral molecular evolutionZika virus

Identifiers

PMID34694399
PMCPMC8586724
OpenAlexW3211122912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.