Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694383›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of public health2022

Electronic cigarette use among adolescents in 17 European study sites: findings from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey.

Yelena Tarasenko, Angela Ciobanu, Ranti Fayokun, Elizaveta Lebedeva, Alison Commar, Kristina Mauer-Stender

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Keep e-cigarette vaping away from juveniles: immediate interventions.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Characteristics of nicotine product use, perceptions of dependence, and passive exposure among first-year university students in Brazil.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Yelena TarasenkoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7062-6960
Angela CiobanuDivision of Country Health Programmes, Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization, WHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of NCDs, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ranti FayokunNo Tobacco Unit, Healthier Populations Division, Health Promotion Department, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elizaveta LebedevaDivision of Country Health Programmes, Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization, WHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of NCDs, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Alison CommarNo Tobacco Unit, Healthier Populations Division, Health Promotion Department, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kristina Mauer-StenderDivision of Country Support and Emergencies, Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization, Copenhagen, Denmark.
WHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of NCD · RUWorld Health Organization · CHGeorgia Southern University · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs new findings on public health implications of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use emerge, its surveillance remains of utmost importance. This study examined the latest state of e-cigarette use in youth in 17 European study sites (i.e. 16 countries and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina) using the Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS).

methodsThis was an observational study. Cross-sectional data on students aged 11-17 years from the latest available GYTS round completed in 17 study sites were used to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence of e-cigarette use by sex and pocket money. Panel GYTS data from five countries were used for the trend analyses. All analyses were weighted to account for the survey design and non-response.

resultsCompared to 2014, the age-adjusted prevalence of e-cigarette use more than doubled in Georgia and Italy, and nearly doubled in Latvia. Significantly more male than female students aged 11-17 years reported use of e-cigarettes, with little to no confounding by age, grade and pocket money across countries. Youth with medium or higher amount of pocket money was 20-200% more likely to use e-cigarettes than those with fewer to no pocket money in 14 study sites. DISCUSSION: As e-cigarette use is becoming widespread throughout the world, there is variation in use among and between countries. Expanded and consistent surveillance of e-cigarette use by all World Health Organization member states is essential to generate data on the extent and correlates of youth e-cigarette use for evidence-based planning and evaluation of the electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems national and global control programmes.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID34694383
PMCPMC8807119
OpenAlexW3208349672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.