Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34694365›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2022

Phenotyping hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using cardiac diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: the relationship between microvascular dysfunction and microstructural changes.

Arka Das, Christopher Kelly, Irvin Teh, Christopher Nguyen, Louise A E Brown, Amrit Chowdhary, Nicholas Jex, Sharmaine Thirunavukarasu, Noor Sharrack, Miroslawa Gorecka and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Microstructural disease and hypoperfusion in dilated cardiomyopathy underpin midwall septal fibrosis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Arka DasBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1134-3036
Christopher KellyBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Irvin TehBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Christopher NguyenCardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Louise A E BrownBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Amrit ChowdharyBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2073-4138
Nicholas JexBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9395-584X
Sharmaine ThirunavukarasuBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Noor SharrackBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5880-1722
Miroslawa GoreckaBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Peter P SwobodaBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
John P GreenwoodBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Peter KellmanNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 31 Center Dr, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9875-6070
James C MoonBarts Heart Centre, The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit and The Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
Rhodri H DaviesBarts Heart Centre, The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit and The Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
Luis R LopesBarts Heart Centre, The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit and The Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
George JoyBarts Heart Centre, The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit and The Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1467-5490
Sven PleinBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Jürgen E SchneiderBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Erica Dall'ArmellinaBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
University of Leeds · GBSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GBCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Serial evaluation of cardioprotective effects of exercise training in heart failure using cardiac diffusion tensor MRIR01HL151704 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NGUYEN, CHRISTOPHER T · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
MECHNISMS OF VENTRICULAR RSPONSE TO INFARCTIONK11HL001820 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, DAVID ALAN · 1986 to 1990
–
British Heart Foundation CH/16/2/32089British Heart Foundation FS/13/71/30378Medical Research Council MR/T005181/1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMicrovascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is predictive of clinical decline, however underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) allows in vivo characterization of myocardial microstructure by quantifying mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA) of diffusion, and secondary eigenvector angle (E2A). In this cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) study, we examine associations between perfusion and cDTI parameters to understand the sequence of pathophysiology and the interrelation between vascular function and underlying microstructure. METHODS AND

resultsTwenty HCM patients underwent 3.0T CMR which included: spin-echo cDTI, adenosine stress and rest perfusion mapping, cine-imaging, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Ten controls underwent cDTI. Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), MD, FA, E2A, and wall thickness were calculated per segment and further divided into subendocardial (inner 50%) and subepicardial (outer 50%) regions. Segments with wall thickness ≤11 mm, MPR ≥2.2, and no visual LGE were classified as 'normal'. Compared to controls, 'normal' HCM segments had increased MD (1.61 ± 0.09 vs. 1.46 ± 0.07 × 10-3 mm2/s, P = 0.02), increased E2A (60 ± 9° vs. 38 ± 12°, P < 0.001), and decreased FA (0.29 ± 0.04 vs. 0.35 ± 0.02, P = 0.002). Across all HCM segments, subendocardial regions had higher MD and lower MPR than subepicardial (MDendo 1.61 ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. MDepi 1.56 ± 0.18 × 10-3 mm2/s, P = 0.003, MPRendo 1.85 ± 0.83, MPRepi 2.28 ± 0.87, P < 0.0001).

conclusionIn HCM patients, even in segments with normal wall thickness, normal perfusion, and no scar, diffusion is more isotropic than in controls, suggesting the presence of underlying cardiomyocyte disarray. Increased E2A suggests the myocardial sheetlets adopt hypercontracted angulation in systole. Increased MD, most notably in the subendocardium, is suggestive of regional remodelling which may explain the reduced subendocardial blood flow.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, HypertrophicDiffusion Tensor ImagingContrast MediaGadoliniumHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMyocardiumContrast MediaGadoliniumdiffusion tensor imaginghypertrophic cardiomyopathymicrovascular dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID34694365
PMCPMC8863073
OpenAlexW3210265902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.