Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34693785›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2023

Peer Support for People Living With HIV: A Scoping Review.

Anita Øgård-Repål, Rigmor C Berg, Mariann Fossum

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07514221 (Adaptation of Project Yes+ to Improve Mental Health and Reduce HIV-related Stigma Among Adolescent and Young Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV in Vietnam), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07514221 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Adaptation of Project Yes+ to Improve Mental Health and Reduce HIV-related Stigma Among Adolescent and Young Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV in Vietnam

TypeinterventionalSponsorHanoi Medical UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsMental Disorder, HIV StigmaArmsTo-Hieu (I understand)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "AIDS care · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anita Øgård-RepålUniversity of Agder, Grimstad, Aust-Agder, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7037-7650
Rigmor C BergNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Mariann FossumUniversity of Agder, Grimstad, Aust-Agder, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4162-4277
University of Agder · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer support for people living with HIV has gained increasing traction and is considered a way to take an active role in self-management. The existing research examining peer support interventions has reported promising evidence of the benefits of peer support. The purpose of our scoping review was to describe research on peer support for people living with HIV. We included 53 studies and sorted them into analytic categories and conducted descriptive analyses. The studies that were published between November/December 2000 and May 2021, had a range of study designs and heterogeneous priority groups, and included 20,657 participants from 16 countries. We identified 43 evaluations of the effect of peer support and 10 evaluations of implementation, process, feasibility, cost of peer support. We also categorized peer support by key functions, finding that the most common key functions were linkage to clinical care and community resources and assistance in daily management, with only one study directly related to chronic care. There is growing research interest in peer support for people living with HIV, particularly in high-income countries and related to the evaluation of effects. The revealed gaps of prioritized functions of peer support have implications for further research. Further focus on interventions addressing secondary prevention related to noncommunicable diseases as part of a care package is recommended to meet people's needs and preferences and increase self-management related to a chronic lifelong condition.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSelf-ManagementChronic DiseaseHumansIncomePeer Groupantiretroviral therapychronic diseasemedication adherencepeer supportpeople living with HIV

Identifiers

PMID34693785
PMCPMC9806454
OpenAlexW3209209779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.