Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34693730›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Feature Selection is Critical for 2-Year Prognosis in Advanced Stage High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer by Using Machine Learning.

Alexandros Laios, Angeliki Katsenou, Yong Sheng Tan, Racheal Johnson, Mohamed Otify, Angelika Kaufmann, Sarika Munot, Amudha Thangavelu, Richard Hutson, Tim Broadhead and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexandros LaiosDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4870-7393
Angeliki KatsenouDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Visual Information Lab, 1980University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Yong Sheng TanDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Racheal JohnsonDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Mohamed OtifyDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Angelika KaufmannDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Sarika MunotDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Amudha ThangaveluDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Richard HutsonDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Tim BroadheadDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Georgios TheophilouDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
David NugentDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Diederick De JongDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, 98540St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0081-674X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccurate prediction of patient prognosis can be especially useful for the selection of best treatment protocols. Machine Learning can serve this purpose by making predictions based upon generalizable clinical patterns embedded within learning datasets. We designed a study to support the feature selection for the 2-year prognostic period and compared the performance of several Machine Learning prediction algorithms for accurate 2-year prognosis estimation in advanced-stage high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients.

methodsThe prognosis estimation was formulated as a binary classification problem. Dataset was split into training and test cohorts with repeated random sampling until there was no significant difference (p = 0.20) between the two cohorts. A ten-fold cross-validation was applied. Various state-of-the-art supervised classifiers were used. For feature selection, in addition to the exhaustive search for the best combination of features, we used the-chi square test of independence and the MRMR method.

resultsTwo hundred nine patients were identified. The model's mean prediction accuracy reached 73%. We demonstrated that Support-Vector-Machine and Ensemble Subspace Discriminant algorithms outperformed Logistic Regression in accuracy indices. The probability of achieving a cancer-free state was maximised with a combination of primary cytoreduction, good performance status and maximal surgical effort (AUC 0.63). Standard chemotherapy, performance status, tumour load and residual disease were consistently predictive of the mid-term overall survival (AUC 0.63-0.66). The model recall and precision were greater than 80%.

conclusionMachine Learning appears to be promising for accurate prognosis estimation. Appropriate feature selection is required when building an HGSOC model for 2-year prognosis prediction. We provide evidence as to what combination of prognosticators leads to the largest impact on the HGSOC 2-year prognosis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPatient AcuityPrognosisProspective StudiesSupport Vector Machineclinical factor analysiscytoreductionMachine Learningovarian cancerpredictive factorsprognosis estimation

Identifiers

PMID34693730
PMCPMC8549478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.