Observational studyCancer medicine2021
Prognostic significance of T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile and PD-L1 expression in patients with esophageal cancer.
Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Immunobiology to Clinical Application: Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Melanoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- A machine learning model reveals expansive downregulation of ligand-receptor interactions that enhance lymphocyte infiltration in melanoma with developed resistance to immune checkpoint blockade.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Innovative molecular subtypes of multiple signaling pathways in colon cancer and validation of FMOD as a prognostic-related marker.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Deactivation of ligand-receptor interactions enhancing lymphocyte infiltration drives melanoma resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Discovery of Targets for Immune-Metabolic Antitumor Drugs Identifies Estrogen-Related Receptor Alpha.Cancer discovery · 2023Article
- Deconvolving Clinically Relevant Cellular Immune Cross-talk from Bulk Gene Expression Using CODEFACS and LIRICS Stratifies Patients with Melanoma to Anti-PD-1 Therapy.Cancer discovery · 2022Article
- Prognostic significance of T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile and PD-L1 expression in patients with esophageal cancer.Cancer medicine · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe ability of the T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) to predict clinical outcome in esophageal cancer (EC) is unknown. This retrospective observational study assessed the prognostic value of GEP and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with EC treated in routine clinical practice.
methodsTumor samples of 294 patients from three centers in Denmark, South Korea, and the United States, collected between 2005 and 2017, were included. T-cell-inflamed GEP score was defined as non-low or low using a cutoff of -1.54. A combined positive score (CPS) ≥10 was defined as PD-L1 expression positivity. Associations between overall survival (OS) and GEP status and PD-L1 expression were explored by Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, sex, histology, stage, and performance status.
resultsMedian age was 65 years; 63% of patients had adenocarcinoma (AC) and 37% had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Thirty-six percent of tumors were GEP non-low, with higher prevalence in AC (46%) than SCC (18%). Twenty-one percent were PD-L1-positive: 32% in South Korean samples versus 16% in non-Asian samples and 26% in SCC versus 18% in AC. GEP scores and PD-L1 CPS were weakly correlated (Spearman's R = 0.363). OS was not significantly associated with GEP status (non-low vs low; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.69-1.19]) or PD-L1 expression status.
conclusionNeither GEP nor PD-L1 expression was a prognostic marker in Asian and non-Asian patients with EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.