Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34693574›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendocrinology2022

ENETS standardized (synoptic) reporting for radiological imaging in neuroendocrine tumours.

Clarisse Dromain, Marie-Pierre Vullierme, Rodney J Hicks, Vikas Prasad, Dermot O'Toole, Wouter W de Herder, Marianne Pavel, Antongiulio Faggiano, Beata Kos-Kudla, Kjell Öberg and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Clarisse DromainDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2999-1958
Marie-Pierre VulliermeDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon - Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3667-8943
Rodney J HicksNeuroendocrine Service, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0758-0824
Vikas PrasadDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2010-4117
Dermot O'TooleSt. James's and St. Vincent's University Hospitals & Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8745-8484
Wouter W de HerderDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1463-5165
Marianne PavelDepartment of Medicine 1, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Antongiulio FaggianoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9324-3946
Beata Kos-KudlaDepartment of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3755-1722
Kjell ÖbergDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Guenter J KrejsDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6149-4150
Enrique GrandeDepartment of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0134-4732
Bruno NiederleDepartment of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8107-4068
Anders SundinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology & Molecular Imaging, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2214-6217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This expert consensus document represents an initiative by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) to provide guidance for synoptic reporting of radiological examinations critical to the diagnosis, grading, staging and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Template drafts for initial tumor staging and follow-up by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were established, based on existing institutional and organisational reporting templates relevant for NEN imaging, and applying the RadLex lexicon of radiological information (Radiological Society of North America), for consistency regarding the radiological terms. During the ENETS Scientific Advisory Board meeting 2018, the template drafts were subject to iterative interdisciplinary discussions among experts in imaging, surgery, gastroenterology, oncology and pathology. Members of the imaging group stated a strong preference for a combination of limited and standardised options by way of drop-down menus. Separate templates were produced for the initial work-up and for follow-up, respectively. To provide a detailed description of the radiological findings of the primary tumor and its local extension and spread, different templates were developed for bronchial, pancreatic and gastrointestinal NENs for CT and MRI, respectively. Each template was structured in 10 sections: clinical details, comparative imaging modality, acquisition technique, primary tumor findings, regional lymph node metastases, distant metastases, TNM classification, reference lesions according to RECIST 1.1, additional findings and conclusion. Two templates were developed for follow-up, for CT and MRI, respectively, and were specifically focused on assessment of therapy response. These included a qualitative response assessment, such as decrease of vascularisation and presence of necrosis, and a quantitative assessment according to RECIST 1.1 and the modified RECIST (mRECIST) for assessing tumor response following transarterial chemoembolisation.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedCTMRIneuroendocrine neoplasiasynoptic reporting

Identifiers

PMID34693574
PMCPMC9286653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.