Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34693322›Full record

ArticleSN social sciences2021

Using data to make the case for program resources and sustainability: the BEST action inventory case study.

Julie M W Rojewski, Nadia Ayala-Lopez, Sean Nguyen, Stephanie W Watts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SN social sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie M W RojewskiMSU Graduate School, Michigan State University, 466 W. Circle Drive, Room 130C, East Lansing, MI 48824-1317 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6936-3083
Nadia Ayala-LopezJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8000-3997
Sean NguyenCell and Molecular Biology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0942-7732
Stephanie W WattsDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9653-6357
Michigan State University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

MSU BEST: Integrated Biomedical Training for Multiple Career OptionsDP7OD020320 · OD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WATTS, STEPHANIE W · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIH HHS DP7 OD020320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Career development programs are a valuable part of any student's experience, and increasingly is an expected part of graduate school training. While such programs are commonly available to undergraduates, there is a growing need for career support to be offered to graduate students. Making the case for resources can be a challenge in this domain, however. Research on the impact of career services for graduate students and post-doctoral scholars is a growing scholarly concern. However, there remains a need to better understand what level of intervention is most appropriate: What kind of activities, how much time, and what resources would best serve the professional development needs of graduate students and post-doctoral scholars? And to answer these questions, a more foundational one: what activities are drawing the attention of graduate students and post doctoral trainees, and in what activities are they spending their time? In this manuscript, we describe how Our University approached this research question by developing an online data tracking system to capture graduate and post-doctoral trainee participation in one co-curricular professional development program. We demonstrate how this data tracking system can be used to advocate for institutional resources in career development programming, for research, and for practical purposes such as advocating for institutional support and for program design and assessment.

Indexed as

AssessmentBiomedicalCareer and professional developmentGraduate studentsPost doctoralProgram review

Identifiers

PMID34693322
PMCPMC8130216
OpenAlexW3161231719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.