ArticleACS omega2021
Design of Experimental Conditions with Machine Learning for Collaborative Organic Synthesis Reactions Using Transition-Metal Catalysts.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Importance of Atomic Charges for Predicting Site-Selective Ir-, Ru-, and Rh-Catalyzed C-H Borylations.The Journal of organic chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve product yields in synthetic reactions, it is important to use appropriate catalysts. In this study, we used machine learning to design catalysts for a reaction system in which both Buchwald-Hartwig-type and Suzuki-Miyaura-type cross-coupling reactions proceed simultaneously. First, using an existing dataset, yield prediction models were constructed with machine learning between experimental conditions, including the substrate and catalyst and the yields of the two products. Seven methods for calculating both the substrate and catalyst descriptors were proposed, and the predictive ability of the yield prediction models was discussed in terms of the descriptors and machine learning methods. Then, the constructed models were used to predict the compound yields for new combinations of substrates and catalysts, and the predictions were experimentally validated with high reproducibility, confirming that machine learning can predict yields from experimental conditions with high accuracy. In addition, to design catalysts that will improve the yields in our dataset, we added datasets collected from scientific papers and designed catalyst ligands. The proposed catalyst candidates were tested in actual synthetic experiments, and the experimental results exceeded the existing yields.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.